English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Dick Mountjoy was one of the drafters of Proposition 187 in California which denied beneifts to illegal immigrants, only to be struck down in a court case our then Democratic Governor didn't appeal. His polls are in the 30 somethings while Feinstein's are in the 50 somethings with many not knowing who Dick Mountjoy is. Instead of passing the message to raise his visability, the GOP is essentially bowing out.

Compare this to Randy Graf in Arizona, where the GOP backed a competitor in the PRIMARY, an unheard of event, but the competitor was for a guest worker program, and Graf is not. Graf won the primary, but is now getting precious little support in the main event.

Feinstein is popular, and I voted for her before. However, the impacts of illegal immigration are far too huge, particularly on our schools in California, for me to vote again for someone who voted for the Senate Bill. Where exactly does she think all those new poor people whose taxes can't pay for school will go?

2006-10-15 03:39:15 · 1 answers · asked by DAR 7 in Politics & Government Immigration

Do you think the Republican Party is taking a specific 'support' position only where candidates sign up for a guest worker program?

If you live in California, who do you plan to vote for, Mountjoy or Feinstein?

2006-10-15 03:40:24 · update #1

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-guidesenate15oct15,1,2642334.story

2006-10-15 03:40:36 · update #2

1 answers

I'll bet if she was financially liable for ALL expenses related to illegal immigrants in her state, like out of her pocket, she'd be less likely to be pro-illegal...it's different if it's other people's money...I say build that border fence, it's one thing that'll help California get a handle on its' runaway spending...

2006-10-15 03:56:09 · answer #1 · answered by gokart121 6 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers