Do most religious people like scientist?

Answer 1

Yes, I think so. Fundamentalists aside (Hey, there's a great idea!), most people who have a spiritual life recognize that the spiritual and the scientific are two different points of reference on much the same material. A scientist will be the first to tell you he cannot explain everything; it's not his goal to explain everything. He will provide a scientific explanation for that which can be measured and analyzed, poked and prodded, etc. He will say of spiritual matters, "That's not my department."

Of course, it is also true that many scientists, probably most, have a spiritual side to their own lives. They can look at the same phenomenon from both sides. A medical doctor can tell you all about conception, pregnancy and birth, and still acknowledge that every time a baby is born, healthy and new, ready to start the world over, it is a miracle. We do have everyday miracles, after all: love, compassion, courage, honesty, determination and all the other virtues and graces.

Answer 2

Many scientists, however rejecting creationism, have repudiated Darwinian evolution. Nobel laureate Francis Crick (of Watson-Crick DNA proposed that the themes of existence originating in the worldwide are so super that existence ought to have arisen someplace else interior the universe and then been transported right here. Australian scientist Michael Denton referred to as Darwinian evolution “the super cosmogenic fantasy of the 20 th century.” Swedish embryologist Soren Lovtrup, in Darwinism: The Refutation of a fantasy, wrote: “i think that throughout the destiny the Darwinian fantasy would be ranked the excellent deceit interior the background of technological know-how. whilst this occurs a lot of human beings will pose the question: How did this ever take place?” yet it has become just about well-known between scientists to criticize many factors of evolutionary concept, technological know-how nevertheless clings to the final concept of evolution, even without achieveable mechanism to describe the technique.

Answer 3

I think there is room in this world for both religion and science. Science has proven that the Exodus really occured and I think that God has control over nature and uses nature to make His point sometimes. Christians should not put down scientists and vice versa. Christianity is about faith....believing that which we cannot see. Science is about figuring out how things occur that can be seen. We should be open to both.

Answer 4

They don't, unless the Scientists get too religious.

*nguck*

Answer 5

Cant imagine so because real science breaks down religion which is why alot of discoveries and truths has been snatched and put away by the vatican and the same group of people control media and governments. Also known as shadow government the real few who control the many

Answer 6

I love science & I'm Catholic.

Catholic's contrary to popular belife are way into science. Many Catholics are part of the "Stem Cell research" ... whom the Pope accepts as long as it's "Adult Stem-Cell" and not "Embryo" ... and Catholics own the most private held telescopes outside of the USA government. So, yeah, the Jesuits are star gazers.

Answer 7

I cannot speak for most but I love science. At one time I wanted to be a marine biologist. I think science is fascinating. There is no reason why science and religion have to be on extreme poles.

Answer 8

Not the conservative Christians it would seem. They're quite happy to enjoy the benefits of modern technology but less happy when scientific findings challenge the validity of their beliefs.

Answer 9

Yes. Religion and science are different things.So religious people should not dislike science.

Answer 10

they like science but have some major differeces in creation