if you read Genesis, Chapter No. 4, Verse No. 12, it says… ‘God told Cain: you will never be able to settle you will be a wanderer.’ Few Verses later on Genesis, Chapter No.4, Verse No.17, says…‘Cain built up a city’ – unfulfilled prophecy. If you read Jeremiah, Chapter No.36, Verse No.30, it says that…‘Jehoiachin the father of Jehoiachin… no one will be able to sit on his throne - The throne of David, no one will be able to sit after Jehoiachin.’ If you read later on, II Kings, Chapter No 24, Verse No 6, it says that… ‘Jehoiachin after he died, later on Jehoiachin sat on the throne’ - Unfulfilled prophecy. One is sufficient to prove it is not the word of God - I can give plenty. If you read Ezekiel, Chapter No 26, it says that…‘Nebuchader, he will destroyed Tyre.’ We come to know that Alexander the great, was the person who destroyed Tyre - Unfulfilled prophecy.
2006-10-15 02:19:41 · 9 answers · asked by FATIMA M 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Isaiah, Chapter No. 7, Verse No 14, says, prophesying of…‘The coming of a person who will be born to a virgin - his name shall be Emmanuel.’ They say… the Christians - it refers to Jesus Christ peace be upon him. Born to a virgin - the Hebrew word there is ‘amla’, which means not ‘a virgin’- ‘a young lady.’ The word for ‘virgin’ in Hebrew is, ‘baitula’, which is not there. Even if you agree - we are using concordance - we agree… ‘Virgin’… ‘Virgin’ - No problem. It says… ‘He will be called Immanuel.’ No where in the Bible is Jesus Christ peace be upon him, is called as Immanuel - Unfulfilled prophecy.
2006-10-15 02:20:17 · update #1
I think is kinda known. But We Muslims know Jesus (Ralalahu an) Was born of Virgin Mary, We hold her in High regards and we love both and hold them in High regards and WE KNOW she was a virgin and we know he will come back at the end of times... SO no biggie call him Emanuel, Jesus Christ, Mesiah (Whatever, still the same person, R.A) And we still love him. Salamaleikum sister!
We make no distinction among God's choosen. :)
2006-10-15 02:32:30 · answer #1 · answered by . 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you read Ezekiel, Chapter No 26, it says that…‘Nebuchader, he will destroyed Tyre.’ We come to know that Alexander the great, was the person who destroyed Tyre - Unfulfilled prophecy.
WRONG!
I'll refute this one as I'm leaving for church in a few minutes.
In Ezekiel 26:4 ...what this means is :
The walls refer to the first destruction by Nebuchadezzar,with the phrase ,''I will also scrape her dust from her.' referring to Alexander the Great,who built a causeway to attack the new Tyre.History records that his soldiers,in order to complete the causeway,gathered the dust of old Tyre in baskets and emptied them into the waters,FULFILLING THE PROPHECY.
amen
2006-10-15 02:30:23 · answer #2 · answered by Jeff C 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does it really matter? You would be far better off getting on with your homework, or earning a living, or living a good life, etc., than bothering about something written thousands of years ago. And don't forget that the Dead Sea Scrolls cast doubt on the contents of the Bible and other religious 'Good Books'. That's why the scrolls were suppressed for so long.
You might as well worry about the unfilled prophecies of Nostradamus, or Old Moore's Almanac, as things in the Bible!
2006-10-15 02:32:04 · answer #3 · answered by avian 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
a million) Genesis 4:12 (KJV) "A fugitive and vagabond shalt thou be in the earth." In different words, a runaway and a vacationer. It doesn't say something about not in any respect having a house. 2) in case you examine the finished prophecy of Jeremiah 36, you'll comprehend that the prophecy applies to King Jehoiakim who replaced into the king of Judah on the time of the Babylonian conquest. The prophecy replaced into telling the king that none of his children might want to inherit the throne. His son, Jehoiachin, governed for in difficulty-free words 3 months, and he did not rule over the country. Babylon replaced into already in means. All scholars agree that Jehoiakim replaced into the perfect king of Judah. 3) Nebuchadnezzar destroyed Tyre after a siege of 13 years in 573 BC. Alexander got here alongside 2 hundred years later and destroyed the rebuilt city. 4)Immanuel ability "God with us". Jesus replaced into God in human flesh and He walked between adult males. So He replaced into with us. there's a astonishing debate over the interest "alma." some say that it ability youthful woman or maiden. that does no longer lower price the which technique of the interest "virgin", when you consider that as in the middle East as we talk, it would want to be assumed culturally that any youthful, unmarried woman can be a virgin. the actual incontrovertible truth that someone who's antagonistic to the Bible unearths fault with it is hardly awesome. yet your poor analyze does no longer something to tutor the Bible is faulty.
2016-12-04 20:37:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Acctually, Jesus is called many names. Immanuel means "God with us". It's just one of the many names used for Christ. As for your other arguments, I'm not familiar with them, but I haven't read enough of the Bible yet.
2006-10-15 02:25:31 · answer #5 · answered by teeney1116 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A Prophet must Prophesize:
Muhammad even disqualified himself as a true Prophet of God.
- Sura 29:27 states clearly that, as far as Allah and the Qur'an are concerned, the only true prophets are those related to Isaac (Ishaq) or Jacob (Yaqoub); yet Muhammad, according to Muslim tradition, is related to Ishmael and not Isaac or Jacob.
The real God (Yahweh) chose to establish His covenant with Abraham and Sarah's son Isaac, instead of with Ishmael, the son of the slave girl Hagar. This choice of Isaac by God is mentioned 5 times, beginning in Genesis 17:18-21. Yet, who did this false Islamic god, Allah adopt? Ishmael! In fact, an important Islamic holiday called Id-al-Adha celebrates the bogus near sacrifice of Ishmael by Abraham in Mecca. Even though there is nothing in scripture suggesting Abraham ever set foot in Arabia.
Herein lies another prophetic truth! God rejected Ishmael and Esau because they were "wild donkeys" (Genesis 16:12) and men of the sword (Genesis 27:40). God did promise, however, to make Ishmael a great nation (Arabs). Who can deny that Islam, with its roots in Arabia, has not always acted like psychotic "wild donkeys" and "men of the sword"? I call to mind the rather recent "Cartoon" row with worldwide demonstrations by Muslims. Nothing of the sort occurred in Christendom after Dan Brown published his best selling book of lies known as the "Da Vinci Code".
What can be rationally thought of the nearly weekly suicide bombings by Muslims, and the very real Muslim psychosis of thinking they will kill every Jew, and then every Christian and Hindu and every other non-believer, who doesn't convert to Islam? I advise Islam to read the real "Book" that says in Jeremiah (Prophet Jeremiah) that "there will be no more Jews on the face of the earth when the moon, the sun and the stars no longer shine."
Islam is a Non-Prophet System, literally....
This following passage from the Qur'an shows that Muhammad was one of the imposter's Jesus warned about. In the passage below, Muhammad attempts to make himself equal to the sinless Jesus who showed his divinity by many miracles.
Muhammad himself admitted twice he could do no miracles.
In fact nowhere in the Qur'an does Muhammad perform even one miracle. So for Muslims to claim he performed miracles when the Qur'an itself states he did not is simply lies.
There are no recorded miracles of Muhammad in the Qur'an, but when Muhammad's followers saw Muhammad's inferiority to Jesus they started making some up in the Hadith: Muhammad cut the moon in half with a sword, a palm tree cried like a baby because Muhammad wouldn't preach under it, Muhammad made water flow out of his fingernails so that people could drink--the Hadith contradicts itself on how many supposedly people drank it. These made up "miracles" go on and on. Also, the Hadith makes it clear that Muhammad was a sinner--NOT sinless as some Muslims now claim: "Muhammad replied..."O Allah, set me apart from my sins..." Volume 1, number 711
2006-10-15 03:07:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It seems more like the translations from the original Hebrew to current texts had some undue liberties taken with it--very interesting...
2006-10-15 02:26:06 · answer #7 · answered by George A 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, the Bible says many silly things. It often contradicts history.
2006-10-15 02:21:58 · answer #8 · answered by nondescript 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
THAT WAS THEN, THIS IS NOW!
2006-10-15 02:25:35 · answer #9 · answered by Medicine Eddie 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋