Small radical factions of all of the above mentioned groups.
2006-10-15 02:08:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I genuinely have not chanced on Al Jazeera to be so anti-West. I examine the paper, alongside with the Washington positioned up, and others. Israel did no longer want to occupy Lebanon interior the 80s. They have been protecting themselves against terrorists. Hezbollah is as undesirable for Lebanon because it quite is for Israel. Lebanon fought a civil conflict for Muslim civil rights, have been given it, and now Hezbollah is making an attempt to regulate Lebanon for their very own use. without them, Lebanon and Israel could have a reliable working relationship. Lebanon could be properly off. Iraq? Saddam had to pass. yet, i'm afraid Bush has quite messed that one up. we've civil conflict, and G-d help the human beings there. you're saying united statesa. went there for oil------won't deny that. yet, i think of Bush is greater into pushing his form of government and his Evangelical Christianity. If the conflict had long previous properly, the government a democracy, then Bush could have stepped in pushing his faith. i actually do have self assurance this. he's doing it interior the USA. it quite is frightening. This final conflict------Hezbollah all started it via kidnapping infantrymen. Then, they won't compete with Israel in conflict. Israel had to make a huge push-whilst they are so outnumbered and placed the place they are-------it quite is termed survival. And,Hezbollah stationed themselves between civilians---wager they provide concept to them collateral injury, no longer worth something. What do you mean via harmless slaves in Palestine? Slaves?
2016-10-19 10:32:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anyone with intentions and actions that are interpreted as evil by society is a terrorist. They can come from anywhere, and the common denominator they all have is sin, which is usually manifested as hatred, pride, or haughtiness (I'm probably missing a few sins here that prompt terrorists to be terrorists, so mentally add them if you can think of them).
2006-10-15 02:12:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Iamnotarobot (former believer) 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on who you ask.
If you ask representatives of Hezbollah, Hamas, Taliban and their supporters, no doubt they will say "Death to America and Israel, the true terrorists blah blah blah"
If you ask the victims of Hezbollah, Hamas, Taliban and their ilk... little doubt they will say that Hezbollah, Hamas and the Taliban are the real terrorists.
If you ask me... Hamas, Taliban and their ilk ARE the terrorists
2006-10-15 02:07:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by betterdeadthansorry 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
They're all terrorists but Israel, Hamas and the Taleban are or have been supported by and financed by America-the world's biggest sponsor of terrorism. Ironic isn't it?
2006-10-15 02:05:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
America + Israel = combination of the real terrorist and the biggest lies.
2006-10-15 02:04:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Alone 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Why isn't Islam mentioned as a possible option? Just asking not saying Islam is the real terrorist.. Just thought the question is a bit bigot
2006-10-15 02:04:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Taliban and America
2006-10-15 02:03:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Any one who would harm others to achieve their goals.
This is the true definition of a terrorist.
Love and blessings Don
2006-10-15 02:07:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
the zionist Israelis and their ally the US government.
They are the main culprit, slandering Islam through their media and the one behind the arising numbers of so-called terrorist.
2006-10-15 02:10:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋