Many people state that mass deportation is not possible. Do you think that mass deportation is cheaper than all the benefits and social aid illegals currently receive? Will this also bring down the crime rate?
2006-10-15 02:00:06 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Sen. Ted Kennedy did a study and said in the Senate, it would cost $240 billion dollars to deport illegal aliens.
Well, illegal aliens are costing the American taxpayers $70 BILLION dollars every year.
20,000 Americans have died at the hands of illegal aliens.
1/3 of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens.
The illegal alien's children are going to create a real problem of crime in the United States and already do.
I think Mass deportation will be cheaper in the short run and save American lives at the same time and also take a huge bite out of crime.
2006-10-15 02:11:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I think that mass deportation is not expensive at all if you compare it to all of the benefits and deceases that the majority of this people are bringing to our country. Do you know that tuberculosis is back in the USA, a decease that was eradicated 60 yrs ago. Is this fair to our citizens, I don't think so. Why is it that our vegetables are getting polluted before they come to our tables, do you think that this have nothing to do with the illegals that are working those fields. When this people do their personal necessities do they wash their hands. I think that if we the American people start giving amnesty to all this 12+million illegals we are going to pay big for this mistake.
2006-10-15 03:24:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
In the long run of course the cost of deportation is lower.That along with making sure our borders are secured before we begin the process, would stop, or at least severely curtail the flow of illegal aliens to this nation.
The costs and damage,to our schools would be a huge savings,the use of state and federal entitlements would be decrease,the cost of incarceration of the criminal illegals would decrease.i cant think of a single thing that wouldn't be decreased. .EXCEPT the wages for legal Americans,the wages would go up because the very expensive "cheap" labor source would be eliminated.Thus forcing the employers to pay legal Americans a livable wage ,and that would help them pay for any negligible increase in
food and service costs to the consumer.
2006-10-15 02:27:22 · answer #3 · answered by Yakuza 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think that once Mexico 'gets it', there won't be a need for mass deportations or whatever. Like the man said, 'turn off the magnet'.
Mexico frankly needs to pull up their socks. There's PLENTY of adobe clay and other fine, fine building materials in Mexico, what they need is people that are good at construction. Well, SOMEbody in their country's got some coin, so, let's see some schools. Let's see hospitals. Let's see roads. Let's see OTHER signs that Mexico 'gets it' and is on their way to reform, that they're actively trying to take care of their own people. Maybe, if they really did that, they'd get support from other countries, including ours. But, what we've got NOW isn't working, so people need to apply some of that good old lateral thinking, and figure out how to crack the 'nut' of poverty in Mexico. 'Yes, we can' help Mexico to find the path to good reform, reform that doesn't leave them economically twisting in the wind, forever totally dependent on us etc. I read somewhere that like 90% of Mexico's commerce, legitimate or otherwise, is with our country. I think that's kind of goofy, myself.
Mexico COULD have a much brighter future...but they're gonna have to build it...IN Mexico...frankly, I think they can do it. I've met people from Mexico, talented, intelligent, motivated, maybe if more of em voted...
2006-10-15 02:19:40 · answer #4 · answered by gokart121 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
No, that's what we should do. Our joke of a President is lying when he says that mass deportations are not possible. They are.
2006-10-15 03:40:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes, it would be much cheaper. Yes, it would significantly bring down the crime rate
2006-10-15 02:08:36 · answer #6 · answered by Made in America 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I think that mass deportation of the politicians would be cheap at any price. Mexicans are cool. Politicians are heartless, mindless, greedy, corrupt, power-mad and dangerous. They should be rounded up, airlifted and released without money or clothes in Iraq, Iran, North Korea, etc. They should have tattooed on their chests (in the language of where they've been shipped) "Torture me before I torture you". In the place of politicians we should have humble, underpaid public servants who deal with the collective needs of the people. Ahhhh! Life would be good. And It probably would cost far less than the politicians steal.
2006-10-15 02:27:18 · answer #7 · answered by beast 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
dont know about the crime rate dropping but i would rather spend the money getting rid of these people than on food, housing, medical and any other benefits they get off my money
2006-10-15 02:07:45 · answer #8 · answered by fn_49@hotmail.com 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Here is a video where I say how I feel in a quick response to the minutemen protest.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7-4-nJKgHU
2006-10-15 06:51:26 · answer #9 · answered by SlapADog 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
naww i find it easy to just go and walk to a contruction site and yell imagration everyone pull out youre papers they run like hell its funny
2006-10-15 02:04:15 · answer #10 · answered by james w 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋