2006-10-14 23:23:01 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Painting
Anything by Jackson Pollack. (a.k.a. "Jack the Dripper").
2006-10-14 23:40:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I definatly agree Anything by Jackson Pollock is sooooo over rated i mean brilliant paintings lots of fun but really millions of dollars for splashed blotchy paints a bit ridiculus
2006-10-15 16:35:35 · answer #2 · answered by Kimberley A 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The latest auctioned work by Picasso. He was a great artist but he was also over-rated and he took credit for being an originator when he was more of a follower (cubism was Braque's idea, not Picasso's). He gained his fame by being a self-promoter and there's nothing wrong with that but he was not as great as some of his contemporaries such as Matisse for example.
2006-10-15 11:18:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
IMO the Mona Lisa. The painting needs to be cleaned, and I believe there was originally more of it.
Yes, it is a fine painting, but it overshadows many other fine paintings, many in better repair.
2006-10-15 08:50:13 · answer #4 · answered by kittybriton 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Top 10 most expensively sold paintings. check them out at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
2006-10-16 16:23:09 · answer #5 · answered by lebanese_gentleman2005 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sun flowers by Van gogh, 82.7 m dollars,
paid for by the bank of japan
and reputedly a forgery.
LF
2006-10-15 06:51:00 · answer #6 · answered by lefang 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋