Dear friends, you always clam here that the bible was changed, can anybody give me when did that happen? before islam or after? and what is your profe?
If you would say before, then why did Quran asks you to refer to it when you are not certain about understanding something.
Wama arsalna min qablika illa rijalan noohee ilayhim faisaloo ahla alththikri in kuntum la taAAlamoona
16:43 And before thee also the apostles We sent were but men, to whom We granted inspiration: if ye realise this not, ask of those who possess the Message.
Wama arsalna qablaka illa rijalan noohee ilayhim faisaloo ahla alththikri in kuntum la taAAlamoona
21:7 Before thee, also, the apostles We sent were but men, to whom We granted inspiration: If ye realise this not, ask of those who possess the Message."
Why would he ask you to refer to something wrong??
and if after, what prove you have, for the original texts already exists match what we have today (and they are much older than Islam) ?
2006-10-14 21:31:51 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
are you serious??? WHEN WAS THE BIBLE NOT CHANGED????
new testamet, old testamet, things removed throughout middle ages and added, its basically a living document
2006-10-14 21:34:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
nicely, you may think of so, yet right this is the version between the Quran and the Bible... The Bible underwent many diverse translations and revisions without protecting the originals in tact. The Quran has additionally undergone many diverse translations and revisions, even nonetheless people who've worked on the translations have in no way altered the unique and maximum comprise the unique Arabic script alongside with those translations. additionally, even nonetheless no longer a lot of human beings use Classical Arabic recently, it incredibly is nevertheless a residing language. Aramaic, the language of Jesus (saws) died some time past, and shall we purely wager what languages the prophets earlier him spoke. even nonetheless mainstream Christians won't admit to it, even many Christians agree that the Bible in use as we talk is not any longer the unique word of God, and the Catholic church in Europe has desperate to no longer use it as a real account of historic activities. whether the Quran hadn't mentioned that the Bible have been altered, i might nevertheless locate sufficient evidence as we talk again to the top that it has.
2016-12-13 08:27:59 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hey i like your question. good research too
Muslims don't say directly that "The Bible was absolutly completly changed." in a sense to hurt you.
What we believe is simple.
Since the original first bible was written in arameic. (an extinct and forgotten language) it was later converted to greek, from then to hebrew, and then to an understandable english.
What we are thinking is that through these different translations, the original and literal words of the bible was lost. Im not saying everything, only very few.
I will garantee you right now that if the arameic versions of the bible were to be found and translated not a single muslim will contradict its scripture. trust me. Muslims will happily accept and honor the scriptures as a part of their own.
What we tend to think is that through these translations, the concept of Jesus is the messenger.....was translated to Jesus is God...
believe it or not it can happen. so muslims, respect the Bible and torah, we believe in Adam, Issac, Jacob, Mathew, David, Solomon, Jesus, Moses...
we just follow and hold the Quran because its writtings have NEVER been altered since the time it was revealed to us.
This is scientifically and logically proven.
hope it helped
2006-10-14 22:18:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Which Bible was not changed? Hebrew Bible, Greek Bible, Latin Bible, English Bible, Jewish Bible, Catholics’ Bible, Protestants’ Bible, Eastern Orthodox Church's Bible, which Bible? All these Bibles individually and collectively have been changed and some are still being changed. The Bible contains two main sections: the Old Testament and the New Testament. The Old Testament is recognized by Jews and Christians both. Jews calls it the Hebrew Bible or TANAK. But their Bible has 24 books and some books have two parts thus a total of 39 books. Protestants also have 39 books but in a different order. The same Old Testament of Catholics has 46 books, while Eastern Orthodox Christians have 51 books in their Old Testament. Jewish version of the Bible is based on the Hebrew Masoretic text while Christians generally use the Greek (Septuagint) and Latin (Vulgate) versions as the basis of their Old Testaments. Each group also has variations in the texts of their books as well as in the number of verses.
The New Testament is accepted by Christians only. It has 27 books: four Gospels and then other books and letters of various writers known as apostles. But Catholics add some verses in the Gospels that are not accepted by the Protestants. The Catholics as well as the Eastern Orthodox Christians accept some books that are not accepted by the Protestants.
As far as the ancient manuscripts of the Bible are concerned, it is known to the Biblical scholars that most of the manuscripts came from the fourth century CE down. The manuscripts that are discovered are mostly partial and their texts differ from each other considerably. M. M. Parvis in the Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible (vol. 4, pp. 594-595) says, "The New Testament is now known, in whole or in part, in nearly five thousand Greek manuscripts alone. Every one of these handwritten copies differ from the other one… It has been estimated that these manuscripts and quotations differ among themselves between 150,000 and 250,000 times. The actual figure is, perhaps, much higher. A study of 150 Greek manuscripts of the Gospel of Luke has revealed more than 30,000 different readings… It is safe to say that there is not one sentence in the New Testament in which the manuscripts' tradition is wholly uniform."
Any one can get hold of the Good News Bible and can see for oneself that in the 1300 pages of this modern English version there are almost as many footnotes pointing to phrases, sentences and passages that are omitted or added by various ancient manuscripts or versions. Many of these alterations are not unintentional scribal errors such as are expected in handwritten copies of a book. A careful study of ancient texts has convinced scholars that the variations found in them were very often intentional tampering with the texts. This tampering is still going on for various political or ideological reasons. Under the pressure of the Jewish organizations, many churches in America and Europe have begun rephrasing Jesus' criticism of the Jews in the Gospels. Feminists groups are urging the use of unisex language in the new versions. Homosexual groups have their own versions. All these changes are taking place before our own eyes.
The Encyclopaedia Britannica refers to the different opinions among Christian scholars and researchers concerning the matter of divine inspiration and whether every phrase of the Bible is divinely inspired or not. Then it comments on that in one article (19/20) where it says: “Those who say that every phrase is divinely inspired cannot prove their claims with any ease.”
The American Encyclopaedia states that there is a serious problem that results from the contradictions that appear in different places throughout the fourth Gospel and the three synoptic Gospels. The differences between them are so great that if you accept the synoptic Gospels as sound and correct, this will lead to the conclusion that the Gospel of John is not sound.
It is worth noting that the Gospel of John is the one which focuses the most on their doctrine of trinity; indeed they admit that it was written to establish this doctrine, which the other three Gospels failed to do, and to put an end to the dispute concerning this matter.
The Catholic Church, which strongly adheres to the idea of divine inspiration as the origin of the Bible, confirmed that in a meeting of the Vatican in 1869-1870. But a century later it revised its opinion and admitted, in Vatican II (1962-1965) that these books contain a great deal of defects and some falsehoods, according to what was reported by the French Catholic researcher Dr Maurice Bucaille, who later became a Muslim.
2006-10-14 22:01:46 · answer #4 · answered by SFNDX 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
For me, the proof is the Quran, not to mention history. The Quran tells me that Jesus (pbuh) said that there will be a prophet after him that he called 'Ahmed' - one of the names of prophet Muhammad (pbuh) - and that people need to follow him.
Before the time of the roman catholic, Jesus was honoured as prophet. The trinity concept was introduced during the time of the roman catholic. This is these are the facts introduced in Da Vinci Code and this is why it aroused so much anger and resentment.
But to share this with you and everyone, I am not a Muslim because there is aomething wrong with Christianity or that I do not respect Jesus enough. I am a muslim because there is time for everything. There was time when no one believed in any religion. When Moses was sent, it was time for Judaism. When Jesus was sent, people did not convert because Judaism was wrong, but it was time for Christianity. And the same with Islam. These are all divine religions and they are the same in essence.
Peace be upon you.
2006-10-14 21:49:41 · answer #5 · answered by daliaadel 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Really good question but i m going to answer it with 3 question .
1- how many bible u have ? ( everyone has differences )
2- i wanna u to find out who are those people which the bible call ed with them ?
3- hay do u think GOD almighty could commerce with Marry and brought up Jesus ? if u think then u are mindless
i think it's 80 % changed.
2006-10-14 21:55:20 · answer #6 · answered by roly jazz 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
change?they have filled it ful of fictional statements.which sane person would agree that God restles with man or envies his own prophet or Jesus is God or God's son.Bible has been changed greatly.get over it!
one more thing:how do you expect Jesus to come and save you if you think he's dead?plus do you like him dead or alive?
he's alive my friend.cheer up!
2006-10-15 00:37:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because Christianity and Bible were modified right after Jesus Christ(PBUH) was taken to the heavens. He did not die(as Christians believe) he'll return on earth before the Dooms day. The same Jew who planned to hang and kill Jesus(PBUH) later converted to Christianity was the first modifier of Allah's(GOD) message revealed on Jesus'(PBUH). The Bible of today is not in the exact shape as it was at the time it was revealed on Jesus(PBUH). It was being modified. Today you can see so many versions of the Bible. Qurran is the only Holy book which is in the same form as it was revealed on Prophet Muhammad(PBUH). As it is the last message from Allah He Almaighty Himself took the responsibility of its protection and prevention from modification till dooms day that is why Qurran is in the same form and has only one version not many like Bible. Its no wonder Christianity has so many divisions. Jesus(PBUH) was the Prophet of God not son. Adam is the first Prophet and Muhammad is the last Prophet. Every Prophet God sent before Muhammad(PBUH) informed his followers that there would be another Prophet after him and another message from God but those orders were removed and modified. As Islam is the continuation of Gods messages Allah already informed us in the Holy Qurran that there would be no other Prophet after Muhammad(PBUH). Qurran is the last message form God. Sunnis and shias both believe in the same book .You need to study and learn about Islam before judging it.
2006-10-14 21:34:06 · answer #8 · answered by ajmal 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I am sure it is changed. How am I sure?,, BECAUSE IT IS A BOOK!,, like any other BOOK. Give me a beer now, tired of this religion crap.
2006-10-14 21:34:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
They say the Bible was changed as an excuse for why the Koran and the Bible contradict each other. Basically it goes like this:
"Mohammid didn't change it! THEY changed it! It's a CONSPIRACY!"
2006-10-14 21:36:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋