2006-10-14 21:25:15 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Civil war with the strong surviving, there would be a period of it and then some dictator would step up and get control. This is not a bad thing. 655,000 lives have been lost under our occupation, now that's bad.
2006-10-14 21:31:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We will stay to protect oil and other interests, but not human beings. Our troops are doing the best they can but with the leaders we have it should be no surprise they have to buy their own body armor and construct their vehicles with scrap metal to protect themselves while fighting for the richest country on earth. The Iraq people will and can deal with their own chaos, we have no reason to be there now or ever, it is not or obligation to protect these people from themselves and their ability to change with the times, its a different pitiful world that we should not be invovled in. We will leave that country no worse off than before we invaded except for the dead, on both sides its shameful I know, but the idea we owe them anything because our dumbas* president went to war for personal reasons is mute.
2006-10-15 04:44:06 · answer #2 · answered by Later Me 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the US and UK and other allies pulled out of Iraq Muslim extremists akin to the Taliban would move in and establish a society like we all saw in Afghanistan where the women would become third class citizens and be forced to wear burkahs and such.
A great majority of the people would probably be executed for collaboration with the allied occupation forces, and their way of life would revert back to the medieval and barbaric traditions of the hard core muslim fanatics.
2006-10-15 04:38:44 · answer #3 · answered by Thozz 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can't decide what's the right thing to do - there probably isn't one right thing. It is possible that if the troops are pulled, there would be one less reason for insurgents to fight. They would have less support and the government would get stronger. It's also possible it would become more of a bloodbath than it is now.
2006-10-15 04:34:07 · answer #4 · answered by picopico 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It will probably be chaos like it is now, but you could save some of your lives and hope civil war doesn't totally engulf the country. I suspect the American/British presence is not doing anything good for that country. Those people remember history, and know how their country was created by foreign intervention. They might start to work things out if there is no foreign army there.
2006-10-15 04:30:36 · answer #5 · answered by tiko 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What did they do before we went there and blew the hell out of them The only facts we recieve are from sources that already plan to invade a country The boogie men ( terrorist) came after England ,Israe,l and The U.S. interfered with them. They gave us no just cause to be there thats been proven over and over.
2006-10-15 05:46:17 · answer #6 · answered by beaudrycharles@sbcglobal.net 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They themselves will take care of their, USA has done what they wanted to do....and they got what they wanted(just take the oil and leave Iraq)..now leave the skeleton alone don't be selfish vulture anymore and leave Iraq.
2006-10-15 04:33:08 · answer #7 · answered by aarshi72 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
WHO REALLY CARES??????????????? Why have we taken it upon ourselves to "save" the iraqi people when there are millions in our own country who could benefit from the US troops' service over here.
2006-10-15 04:33:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
its pretty chaotic... i hated the idea of us going there, but at this point we have a responsibility to the people of Iraq to not leave until the situation is better...
2006-10-15 04:27:56 · answer #9 · answered by flawed broadcast 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There would be peace and progress.
2006-10-15 05:36:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋