English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

what exploded in the big bang? Where did the material come from? and where the first life come from? just curious.

2006-10-14 17:29:18 · 16 answers · asked by carolinatinpan 5 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

I asked evolutionists because you guys act like know it alls.Your theory is no more plausable than mine then. Something that never lived can't create life. If it were possible it could be reproduced in a lab under perfect controled conditions. If you can't do it there it didn't just happen. Thanks for trying guys.

2006-10-14 17:55:20 · update #1

16 answers

Alot of this is still unknown.
The bib bang was the explosion of the universe it self. We are still experienceing the effects of the explosion even today.
'material' may be more like energy. Have no idea where it 'comes from' .
I am no scientist by any means. There are many christians that are scientist and 'evolutionists', maybe you should seek them out if you are a christian

2006-10-14 17:33:09 · answer #1 · answered by CJunk 4 · 1 0

Why do people assume that the big bang, which comes from theoretical physics, and evolution, which is about biology, can be explained together in the same question? The delineation of species is so far flung away from the big bang theory, it's like looking in your cookbook to find out how to change a flat tire.

Big Bang Theory: Scientists have not been able to gather data further back than a few seconds after the big bang. No data means no testable theory. We hope that there will emerge some way of gather ing data, but it ain't going to be easy.

First life: Amino Acids in the vicinity of a heat source, such as a volcanic vent, combined and formed RNA, which in the presence of such energy became a self-replicating molecule. This went further to become DNA, and genetic material. Cells developed as variations in the replications arose, and cells provided protection for the RNA or DNA, so those were able to reproduce more successfully.

2006-10-14 17:39:44 · answer #2 · answered by NHBaritone 7 · 1 1

First off, these are questions about the big bang theory that is apart from evolution itself. Even if you disprove ALL of the big bang, it wouldn't change a word of evolution.

As far as my knowledge goes it was an explosion between 2 chemical elements that gave rise to all the other elements. If you understand supernova's and the periodic table, you'll realize all elements are based on 2 elements.

Where did the material come from? Nobody knows. Where did the first life come from? It is thought to originate in the primordial soup where the environment was just right to develop a living organism. Some bottom up studies like stanley miller have done this and found proteins. Sadly, we don't have 1 billion years to run this experiment the way that the earth did.

I hope you're asking this to know and not to try to undermine evolution and the big bang. If you are, you are failing because you're appealing to ignorance. You're saying "we don't understand it, so god must have done it." The greeks thought thunder was done by the gods, but now we know better. Ignorance is no way to try to "prove" your point.

2006-10-14 17:35:35 · answer #3 · answered by Alucard 4 · 2 1

No one knows, but that doesn't mean that science will never have an answer.

The Big Bang really did happen; if you look at it with an open mind, the theory is really convincing. But my understanding is that the Big Bang doesn't even go into the question of what blew up -- the point is that they just know something did. What that was is a mystery that will probably be unsolved for some time, but the point is that there WAS a "bang" -- whatever that "bang" was.

2006-10-14 17:30:57 · answer #4 · answered by . 7 · 4 1

Professor Adjineri is incorrect lower back. (he's extremely a guy!) you do not ought to have a scientific rationalization for some thing before you ought to use it. If it works, you ought to use it. The birds did not have a theory of flight, yet they flew. women people did not comprehend what made cleansing soap do what it does (many nonetheless do not), yet they have been given their outfits clean besides. that's the version between a discovery and an invention. Darwin stumbled on what the animals and flowers have been doing by time. He did not invent the phenomenon, he in effortless terms defined it in a fashion that made extra experience than people who wrote before, which includes Lamarck.

2016-10-16 05:13:41 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

With the Big Bang part, an alum from my school just jointly won the Nobel prize in physics for new work confirming the Big Bang. Look into that. Then we can go play with life's origins. After that, we may even get into an area that actually has something to do with evolution.

2006-10-14 17:42:40 · answer #6 · answered by Phil 5 · 1 1

Well all of life begins with an explosion of some sorts.....aren't you glad!

But I have to tell you that evolution does not address the big bang theory, where it came from, or the first life form. Those things belong to a topic called abiogenisis. Evolution is simply the progress of organisms into higher organisms.

2006-10-14 17:32:40 · answer #7 · answered by Bomb Diggity 3 · 1 1

i think the universe exploded in the big bang.

i think the material was always there, because the universe had just finished collapsing upon itself, ready to expand out again.

i think the first life came from energized primordial ooze, creating one-celled organisms (the energy was always there, too, just in case you were wondering).

2006-10-14 17:55:19 · answer #8 · answered by lostcause8436 3 · 1 1

We dont have a valid answer that we can support with evidence. At best, we can say, some force or a group of forces.

We dont make assertions that we cant back up.

Secondly, why are you asking evolutionists this...shouldnt you ask a physicist?

2006-10-14 17:31:55 · answer #9 · answered by leikevy 5 · 3 1

My theory of creation requires some atoms of the simplest element imaginable, hydrogen. Yours requires a fully formed omniscient and omnipotent supernatural being, capable of listening to and answering prayers, and who knows what else. Mine seems more likely.

2006-10-14 17:37:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers