After 09/11, does it make sense to allow 'rich guy' mosquitocraft to fly around in our cities? Don't crashes like Lidle's make the case for cancelling aircraft access to urban areas?
I know we're goring some pretty important oxen here to even ask the question. It's almost like complaining about golf courses during a drought. But the safety and well-being of the millions of city dwellers should outweigh the convenience and sightseeing desires of a few rich guys, don'tcha think?
2006-10-14
16:34:47
·
6 answers
·
asked by
nora22000
7
in
Cars & Transportation
➔ Safety
Of course the air is divided into zones for flying, but ALL aircraft use the small aircraft low-level zones to land. Plus, the proliferation of mosquitocraft is dangerous to city dwellers, especially with terrorism.
Don't get me wrong; I think amateur pilots have been stellar in protecting themselves and others, more responsible than drivers and gun owners overall.
But can we afford --from a safety standpoint--small planes (and helicopters too) in our cities?
2006-10-15
05:04:52 ·
update #1
Pilots are wealthy--in time to devote to the hobby, in money for airtime, fuel, and access to craft not useful (in most cases) for practical applications such as basic transportation or support in work tasks (such as is possible with pickup trucks or cars). Even if pilot hobbyists don't see themselves as rich, they are indulging in a rich man's pastime which costs an exhorbitant amount to support compared to bowling or fantasy football hobbies, for example. Nothing wrong with that, by the way, but it should be acknowledged.
2006-10-15
19:25:26 ·
update #2