English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

When it is computer controlled?

2006-10-14 15:16:34 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Cars & Transportation Rail

3 answers

The same reason that all aircraft still have pilots even though it has been possible to control everything by computers for years... we humans don't trust computers and want to have another human in control even if they aren't. Once we accept that computers don't make mistakes and humans do, then the driver's and pilot's seats will disappear from trains and planes

2006-10-14 16:01:26 · answer #1 · answered by xpatgary 4 · 0 0

Radio controlled operation of yard switching operations has been in service quite some time. And, in that time, the number of collisions and fatalities in rail yards has increased three fold when compared to man hours worked for the same service.

A computer will never be able to operate tonnage trains over existing class one railroad trackage. It is not an airplane with limited variables as a part of day to day operations. It is when training takes over, and a human is at the controls, that air disasters are avoided, or the consequences are minimized. Ask the passengers of the plane that was "landed" by three pilots working throttle and flaps after hydraulic lines had been severed, if they would have preferred a computer at the "controls", which no longer worked. I say ask them, because 2/3s of the passengers can still answer as they walked away from the disaster.

Same thing with that tonnage freight train that will roll through your town sometime tonight. A typical consist? How about 680,000 gallons of LPG, 3,500 tons of fertilizer (ammonium nitrate. Timothy McVey and Terry Nichols did some handy work with three or four fifty gallon drums of the stuff mixed with diesel fuel in Oklahoma City a few years back, remember? Reference above mentioned tonnage mixed with, say, 12,000 gallons of diesel, mixed as a result of a derailment. Oh. yeah. Let's put the computers in control right away!), toss in some ammonia, cholrine, maybe a couple thousand tons of coal, some hygrogen peroxide, sulfuric acid, lumber and, just for good measure, a few carloads of phosphorus and cyanide based chemicals.

Add another 5,000 tons of mixed merchandise.

And, double all of that if there is a head on collision or a derailment plows into a train standing on an adjacent track or tracks.

Yep. Turn it over to the "un-erring" computers. This is the same mindset that keeps people from demanding of DHS and representatives in Washington that some measure be taken to try to guard against using these same vehicles as weapons. It will make the twin towers look like a warm up act. And it is much easier to do.

Why don't you all ask your favorite political hopefuls how this scenario plays into their attempts to improve security?

We're going to eat this stuff if we don't. The railroaders and unions have been beating this drum for sometime with NO ATTENTION PAID AT ALL.

Better wake up.....................................

2006-10-14 18:31:49 · answer #2 · answered by Samurai Hoghead 7 · 0 0

Probably the same reason that the Docklands in London has driver controls in a cabinet at the front of the train. For when the computer goes wrong, or when people are on the tracks.

2006-10-15 01:18:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers