I always thought that countries who are on the Security Council cannot have one of their citizens run the UN. Is this true.
I was told Bill Clinton was interested in the job but I did not think he was eligible.
2006-10-14 12:58:53 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Embassies & Consulates
I am no huge fan of the UN myself. The question has no political agenda, I just do not have the information on the subject
2006-10-14 13:06:48 · update #1
NO. Permanent Members of the Security Council cannot have one of theirs as Secretary General.
2006-10-14 15:33:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
That might be difficult to pull off. The world already thinks that the U.S. has an inordinate amount of power in world relations. Having a U.S. Head of the United Nations might give the impression of an attempt at world dominance.
2006-10-14 20:08:12 · answer #2 · answered by Apple21 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The UN is a corrupt crooked organization.
But even they, made sure that Clinton was not eligible.
There is a limit, you know.
(Actually, the UN is much more corrupt and worthless than Clinton. Either one of them.)
Hey, Bill & Hillary, I stuck up for you.
Send me some money, honey.
2006-10-14 20:05:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
yes informally they rotate it around the continents, that is why it is asia's turn.but an american would be very hard to get pass the general assembly.
2006-10-14 20:03:49 · answer #4 · answered by ??? 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In your sleep monster
2006-10-14 21:17:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I hope not
2006-10-14 20:00:00 · answer #6 · answered by RX 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
learn more at www.un.org
2006-10-14 23:49:10 · answer #7 · answered by CCC 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋