English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is it necessary to continue stem cell research ?what are the advantages and risks of stem cell research ?

2006-10-14 12:09:39 · 8 answers · asked by menu 1 in Science & Mathematics Medicine

8 answers

advantage - it would help baby-murdering liberals justify abortion

disadvantage - it would turn women into stem cell farms.

note --- there are more than enough stem cell samples for science to proceed with their research for decades. no need to draft any law making NEW stem cells available.

2006-10-14 12:12:30 · answer #1 · answered by sharrron 5 · 0 0

As mentioned before, stem cells can help cure so many diseases nowadays like Parkinson's. Cancer patients would be able to replace cells destroyed by the chemo. And if the diseases can't be cured completely, they can certainly be alleviated incredibly. And not just diseases. Someone who suffered spinal cord damage could have stem cells implanted that could grow into new nerve cells that could provide them with motion in their lower body, for example.

In addition, there has been a new way discovered to remove stem cells from embryos without killing the embryo. This is the link to the article found on the New York Daily News: http://www.advancedcell.com/recent-news-item/anti-stem-cell-zealots-are-all-out-of-ammo And, if I remember correctly, this same procedure was also spoken about on MSNBC. The embryo simply has a cell removed in a superearly stage while they're still invitro. This is, actually, the same technique used to see if a person is a carrier for and/or will develop a genetic disease. Looks like the excuse that it's murder can't be used anymore.

On the other hand, there is a danger. Stem cells kept for too long may develop many genetic abnormalities. Lab mice treated with stem cells to treat Parkinson's developed brain tumors in 20% of the cases. And there is another ethical argument: if stem cells are able to be used efficiently and can be manipulated to the point many people want them to, it may come to the point that someone dying from a heart condition could simply pay for a new heart created from stem cells. An eighty-year old patient with lung problems could have a new set created and implanted. Basically, if the research is taken to the extreme, how and when will humans die if they can simply have their body's cells replaced over and over?

Stem cells can provide invaluable help to the field of medicine. But, they are something to be carefully monitored and controlled.

2006-10-14 13:26:26 · answer #2 · answered by Mnemosyne_21 1 · 0 0

Stem cell research holds promise for curing a wide range of terrible diseases: diabetes, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, and spinal cord injuries.

There are not enough stem cell lines for adequate research. There are only 19 lines of stem cells adequate for federally funded research, and many of those have become contaminated so researchers can no longer use them. Privately funded researchers and many researchers outside the US are developing lots of new stem cell lines. Over 128 lines have been developed since 2001, many that will help researchers study and maybe find cures for many other diseases, including beta thalassemia, neurofibromatosis type 1, Marfan syndrome, myotonic dystrophy, Fragile X syndrome, and Fanconi anemia. Stem cell research may one day find cures for many terrible diseases that cause immense suffering in the world.

Stem cell research is a booming scientific field in many other countries so will proceed even if not in the US.

2006-10-14 13:20:25 · answer #3 · answered by Jennifer 2 · 0 0

a million. i've got not got self assurance (atheist) 2. confident 3. i'm expert decision yet i'm against any investment that is going to abortion clinics 4. confident 5. the only similarities between stem cellular study and abortion is the embryonic stem cellular study. I help stem cellular study. i'm a form a million diabetic, so i've got have been given faith that stem cellular study might desire to in all probability detect a clinical care. the only human beings it incredibly knows what it fairly is decide to have form a million diabetes, are the human beings that have form a million diabetes. comparable with each physique else with a continual ailment. 6. truthfully no longer. Stem cellular study is taking us into an era of supplies and desire for the human beings who could income from it. 7. From a clinical perspective, no person fairly knows on an analogous time as the human fetus will strengthen into sentient. i've got have been given faith a fetus indoors the womb is 'alive,' indoors the experience that it fairly is created from residing cells. It is merely no longer waiting to stay outdoors the mummy's womb, no count if. 8. useful Your welcome

2016-12-13 08:19:19 · answer #4 · answered by lesniewski 4 · 0 0

Ethical and religious considerations aside, an important distinction for the common use meaning of "stem cell research" is that it is referring to embryonic stem cells, which, by definition, are derived from human embryos. It's worth noting that there are many other potential stem cell sources, such as umbilical cord blood, and pediatric and adult bone marrow, peripheral blood, and tissues such as fat, skin, etc.

2006-10-14 14:48:44 · answer #5 · answered by perforin 1 · 0 0

Yes!!!

Advantages: We can learn more about how cells develop
Diseases could be cured
Paralysis can be fixed
Undesirable traits could be "thrown away"
Organs could be made (less need for donations)
It could result in more "open doors" for scientist

Disadvantages: Misunderstanding of the public like; it could lead to cloning; unrelevant debates (scientist would be playing god), etc.

2006-10-14 13:35:57 · answer #6 · answered by viperstrongman 1 · 0 0

We may find cures to Multiple Sclerosis, Parkinson's Disease, Nerve Regeneration and numerous other ways to benefit persons currently afflicted with these impairments/challenges. There is more risk in discontinuing this valuable research, than in continuing it.

2006-10-14 12:13:36 · answer #7 · answered by Rhonda 7 · 0 0

It can save lives, period.

I believe it is more important to attempt to save current life than to “save” embryos that will, possibly, become babies.

2006-10-14 12:12:52 · answer #8 · answered by SydneyS 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers