for me, it is cloning...i think maybe we shouldn't do it but not enough evidence yet to make up my mind
Did you know Dolly the cloned sheep died early from arthritis?
what's yours?
2006-10-14 11:14:28 · 8 answers · asked by kimandchris2 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
ethical =pertaining to or dealing with morals or the principles of morality; pertaining to right and wrong in conduct.
For those who are anti-religion, fine,answer based on ethics- that why it was included in the question .
2006-10-14 11:56:41 · update #1
im against stem cell research
2006-10-14 11:17:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Religious evolution. The Sunday school version of the truth needs to be upgraded for adults. Most likely Dolly died because of using defective DNA material from an older animal. Cloning is as far as we know for the most part still in it's early stages. The research was developed to save lives not for creating new super beings. Other countries somewhere are most likely doing advanced cloning research or using humans in lab experiments like Korea or China. This isn't really playing God, just in his sand box. That's what knowledge and free will is supposed to be. To learn the hard and long way. When we finally understand how to grow genetic material such as an arm or leg etc we will understand what Christ may have done when he had healed people. It isn't about deception it was being enlightened with the knowledge and power he had access to. Was Jesus a hybrid or a host? Or even both. (For thou art with me)
2006-10-14 18:36:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No did she? You have a very good question there. Mine is that of evolution. How anyone can believe that man evolved from anything other than man is beyond me. There is no scientific evidence to the contrary, yet alot of people believe that we generated from some other creature or life form. Go figure.
2006-10-14 18:20:23 · answer #3 · answered by bro_ken128 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Along similar lines.
Scientists should not just ask "Can we do it", but also "Should we do it".
Having said that, what limit should be put on knowledge? No invention is completely new, it tends to be a progression of knowledge already obtained.
2006-10-14 18:18:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why not allow science to enhance your religions? instead of looking for what may not fit?
2006-10-14 18:17:12 · answer #5 · answered by jmmevolve 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yea... I hear you. For me it's sperm. Sperm are living... look through a microscope and you will see them struggling pitifully towards an ovum that is not there. How... in God's name... how.. can you not feel for them? HOW?
It's a 'size' thing... isn't it? Just because we're macroscopic... you're a bully??!!??
2006-10-14 18:18:58 · answer #6 · answered by eantaelor 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sorry. I don't let my perception of science be smudged by religious considerations.
2006-10-14 18:20:45 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
gravity....the heavy weights rule..
2006-10-14 18:22:22 · answer #8 · answered by murphys_lawyers 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋