American army and their puppets (invadors and traitors) trying their best to control Iraq but fail, so are they fighting with Insurgents or Iraqi nation?
2006-10-14 03:38:59 · 15 answers · asked by bashar 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Don't forget Americans are also playing the game " Divide and rule " around the world. If they don't do this who will support them in Iraq or Afghanistan. Why they were saddam's friend against Iran?
2006-10-14 04:00:58 · update #1
People are ignorant about Islam which is one of the major religion on earth. I'm reading answers and this person is thinking Muslim is a religion. I just want to say people don't have good research about things and unfortunatley we're misguided by Meida. Islam is religion of peace and lvoe but sorry to say media.............
2006-10-14 04:40:16 · update #2
Islam is a religion of Peace and love.
2006-10-14 04:41:19 · update #3
The military is fighting the insurgents. If we had wanted to take control of Iraq, that would have been a hell of a lot easier.
2006-10-14 03:42:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Islam may be a religion of peace and love, but when you add "extremist" to the end of it, you get things like 3000 people dying because 3 commercial airliners were crashed into US buildings by "Islamic" religious groups. Whether the war is Iraq is justified because of the attacks on 9/11, or for any other reason is another discussion.
There is a lot of misguided information, a lot of stereotypes and generalizations, and much of that is unfair to the rest of the region that is receiving so much world attention right now. It is unfortunate. I've pointed out on other occasions, you shouldn't take it personally, most Americans don't even know their own history, much less someone else's. And since Americans are typically quick to judge, you get entire "truths" based on certain incidents like the one mentioned above.
We aren't so much corrupt as gullable. SOME things have gotten better in Iraq, so I'm told, but you don't see our media focusing on THAT, now do we? If the truth of Iraq is that the American campaign is failing in its mission, what is the media leaving out?
2006-10-14 06:56:26 · answer #2 · answered by desiderio 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the Iraqis gave us a chance in the beginning of the occupation but the Bush administration blew it and now the majority of Iraqis support the attacks on the U.S. troops. We are pushed back in our green zone and the media is ether at the airport or the green zone.
We may have won the war with Saddam's government but we are losing the occupation. The Bush administration has done a great job of turning the word insurgent into the word terrorist. I think it will only get worse for out troops when Bush invades Iran very soon. We have to get the Dem`s back in so we have some people with real war and occupation experience. I think the Republicans are great at doing the shooting and bombing but are poor at planing because they are mostly stuck in their ways.
2006-10-14 03:55:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Neither.
The question is deliberately abrasive and does not allow for intelligent discussion of the issue.
America is a place where you are not only free to ask this question, to be for or against the action in Iraq, but where the law of the land and the belief of the people is that freedom is your right.
Let's hope for the safety and security of all good people around the world and for a lasting peace. All goals start as a dream, then a hope, then an action, and so on.
A good way to start is to ask a question in a fair and honest manor that is not specifically designed to attack people.
2006-10-14 04:00:40 · answer #4 · answered by st3curl 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that to an certain extent we are controlled by the information that we receive from the media. I try to consult different sources throughout the day to get a better pictures of what is going on in the world of what interest me.
Now the American Army is not puppets. Nor are the Traitors I will not stand for any of that. They are doing their job as directed by their commander in chief, it is he that is the problem as he is using these service people for his own personal gain and for the very rich people that he associates with. He is the one that should be on trial, for his crimes against the Iraqi people, his crimes against the American people and his crimes against humanity.
2006-10-14 03:57:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
To the first part of this question: No, we are not corrupt. And we are not controlled by the media into seeing the truth about Iraq. What the media shows has little in common with the truth.
Do you even watch our media? It's controlled mostly by left wing pinkos who hate Bush and report every negative story they can find about the war in Iraq.
As to why we were on Iraq's side against Iran in the 1980's- I think it had something to do with a psychotic dictator maniac named Ayatollah Khomeini. At the time, he was the greater of the two evils, so we had to side with Iraq.
2006-10-14 06:37:02 · answer #6 · answered by Namtrac 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Your last part being Islam is a religion of peace and love following a soapbox of control by the media. How about we talk about the control of the radical muslim clerics over their people. I know what the koran says, and I know what the fanatics do. They don't match. The book may be peaceful, but the religion isn't
2006-10-14 05:36:46 · answer #7 · answered by rev.nuclear 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What do you mean by Corrupt nation ? What Corrupt ? Don't you read the international current affairs ? You know majority of American media are exposing that America did wrong by entering into Iraq.
America never tried to invade any country. They have vast territory that is more than enough.
2006-10-14 03:59:04 · answer #8 · answered by adraya 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I will answer only one part of your question, in which I am more familiar with. The Government does dictate to the Media what they can put on or not. There are a lot of atrocities happening in this particular war that the government will not allow us to see.
I cannot remember the soldier (woman) that got rescued at the beginning of this war, they had said (in the media) that she was captured after she had emptied out a machine gun on her captors. She later on came on television and said that she was not able to fire her gun because it had jammed. But that was the excuse they gave on why all the money was spent on rescuing her, things that they do not do for others.
2006-10-14 04:37:54 · answer #9 · answered by Boricua Born 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So Islam is about peace and love? I wonder if their definition of love and peace includes killing innocent people in the name of ala or whoever they pray to. I am no religious person but iI have a deep respect for life. I dont think that the ones that did 911 were either peacefull or loving in any way but they were musliims and they killed lots of people and cause of them people still get killed in Irak and Afghanistan.
2006-10-14 08:50:14 · answer #10 · answered by xadralix 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't understand the question. The media seems to be saying we are failing in Iraq. At least that's the way I read it.
I think your choice of words, corrupt-innocent-controlled, are poor choices.
Why don't you spend a little time trying to construct a reasonable question, I assuming you are interested in an answer rather than just spouting off.
2006-10-14 03:46:37 · answer #11 · answered by madjer21755 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋