for lies and incompetence
wouldn't you be kicked out of your job if your predictions were so wrong, you got it so wrong and you did so poorly??
2006-10-14 02:23:56 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Fired? I'd probably be put on trial for crimes against humanity.
2006-10-14 02:26:47 · answer #1 · answered by Phil S 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
I heard Jody williams (Nobel Peace Prize Winner 1997) quote a US government source on BBC international debate software, saying that the fee of the conflict became $10 Billion a month!!! insanity.
2016-12-16 07:35:57 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely
2006-10-14 02:45:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nothing so far has surprised me - it's gone exactly as I expected.
I still expect the cost to exceed 1 trillion dollars - despite people laughing at me a year ago.
So should we fire these people, or smack the voters round the head for voting for these frauds ?
2006-10-14 02:33:49 · answer #4 · answered by dryheatdave 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
YOU ARE JUST MAKING THIS CRAP UP OUT OF YOUR OWN TWISTED BELIEFS. BUSH. CHENEY AND RUMSFEDL ALL SAID THAT IT WAS GOING TO TAKE A LONG TIME, RIGHT FROM THE BEGINNING. I love the way you loony Kool Aid drinkers continually make this crap up. I bet that, when the wind blows, your head whistles like a piccolo
2006-10-14 03:18:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No..
They did a great job...
War was won exactly as predicted...
4th largest army in world was defeated in 2 weeks...
No one predicted Iraqui's would then want to kill each other...
Wake up...
Watch the news..
Use some common sense..
Think for yourself...
2006-10-14 02:33:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Your question is flawed, and your premise is based on a lie,
aside from that, why do you think they are called predictions.
Now go back to sweeping the floors, you could lose you job
for playing on office computers.
2006-10-14 02:53:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Rumsfeld should be. He is the main reason because it's his half-cocked planning that causes this. He didn't listen to any of his generals. Read Tommy Franks' book, he tells about it and how Rumsfeld shot down (no pun intended) every idea about a large force.
That said, I think it would have ended up like this no matter who was in charge.
2006-10-14 02:27:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
It happens everyday all across the globe.
You would probably be out of a job also.
2006-10-14 02:26:41 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Especially with the cost overruns
2006-10-14 02:25:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋