Should I split the money?

Question

a Co-Worker at work offered to pay my way into the weekly drawing we have at work. it costs $2.00 and you write your name on a piece of paper whoevers name is drawn out wins. Well tonight I won. And I only gave my Co-Worker the $2.00 back and I won $70.00. Should I have Split it with him or not. I did not ask to borrow the money, He offered. But I don't want to cut him out of what he may have a right to. What do you think?

Answer 1

I probably would have given him half, as I wouldn't have even been in the draw if it wasn't for his generosity. It's up to you though. :-/

Answer 2

If your co-worker hadn't put you in, you'd have nothing. By giving him half, you're still $35 better off. Technically, it's all yours but giving him back the $2 is probably worse than giving him nothing at all!

At the very least you should genuinely offer him $35. If it doesn't mean a lot to him and is happy for you to have the lot then he will be insistent that you keep it all. Or he may be happy to suggest a lesser amount. The fact he even accepted the $2 back suggests he'd also readily accept half of the winnings. Considering it didn't cost you anything in the first place, it's probably more efficient just to give him half and be done with it. The downside cost for you amongst work colleagues of being potentially labelled a 'tight-****' may be much greater than the monetary value of $35! Not sure where you're from, but in my part of the world it's not considered to be the most endearing quality to posess. I imagine it's universal though. There's nothing wrong with being generous.

Answer 3

My concepts are which you're MARRIED now, and there is no "my funds" vs "you money" anymore. that's all "our funds," and the source of it would not make one individual or the different extra entitled to dictate the place that's meant to bypass. All income is kin income. And that's genuine no rely in case you monetary corporation jointly or one after the other. the answer that's glaring. split it. shop 0.5, use the different 0.5 to pay some debt and/or bulk up your bill paying account. Or an optimal answer... decrease off a small slice for each of you to have some "exciting funds" (possibly 5% for each) and split something down the middle between costs and fee reductions. that's what my husband and that i do as quickly as we get a providence. this would not ought to alter right into a extensive argument between you. of course you're an prolonged-term philosopher on an identical time as the hubster is a quick-term philosopher. which may be a solid mixture, have faith it or not. on an identical time as an emergency fund is genuinely mandatory, on the comparable time, that's superb to have some respiratory room from paid off debt and somewhat extra on your bill-paying account. You the two had a solid theory, and because to procure a solid chew of funds, then you definately can do them the two.

Answer 4

Let your conscience be your guide. remember without his $2.00 you would have 0 dollars won so what if the role were reversed be honest with yourself say someone wanted to play mega millions and did not have the money and you gave or lent them the money would you or would you not want your fair share. Offer 1/2 of your wind fall he may not even want it but at least you will know you did the right thing unless you just feel it's loss my gain

Answer 5

if youre co worker thouhgt enough of you to give you the 2.00 so you could have a chance to win 70.00. If it was the other way around wouldn't you be hoping he would do the right thing??You already know the answer.. you are just wanting someone to make you fell like it's ok to screw a person .......

Answer 6

Hmm...good question. Just wondering if the roles were reversed and you fronted him money to buy him a ticket, and say, he hit for $1 million. Would you be looking for a share of the money? Think of a % that you would want of that and give him that same % of the money that you won. Do the right thing! You'll feel better about the whole situation.

Answer 7

I say you take him to lunch and get his take on it -- work things out. Personally, I would say that without an agreement, lunch would do well for anything under a $100.

However, to keep from having to go through this again. Set the ground rules from the start. Just a, "Hey, man, if I win -- we split it equally." That goes for when someone buys it for you or you buy it for someone else. Unless you believe otherwise.

Good fortune is not the time for greed.

Answer 8

I'm with them.

When he put in the 2 dollars, neither of you probably thought you'd actually win, so it would have only been a lost 2 bucks. But you know without a shadow of a doubt that if it hadn't been for his two dollars, you would not have won the 70.

Take him to McDonalds for a Big Mac, at least. :-)

Answer 9

Out of good will you should share.
Think if you had the $2 then you would of taken part any way but as you did not have the $2 he helped you to gain the $70.

Answer 10

No need to give him half. Paying him the $2 is fine. After all this is a draw and it's a fair game and he did offer to lend the $2. How about buying him muffins and coffee for breakfast.

Answer 11

Flower or chocolate for a lady..... and a good wine for a guy.... as an appreciation. Splitting $70 is way too weird... not big enough to make a fuss about.