English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-13 16:56:18 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health Diseases & Conditions Cancer

22 answers

Lung Cancer in Non-Smokers
By: Mary Desaulniers

More and more often, I come across cases of nonsmokers who develop lung cancer. My attention is always drawn to news of this nature because my husband passed away at the age of 51 from brain and lung cancer. He never smoked a day in his life.

The complacency non-smokers have shared over the years is no longer a viable option. Smokers and non-smokers alike are vulnerable to a disease which is largely incurable. Among patients with lung cancer, only about 14% live five years after their diagnosis.

In the face of a disease that seems to have neither rhyme nor reason, what can we do to protect ourselves? First, assess your risk for lung cancer; then take measures to prevent the disease.

What are the risk factors for lung cancer?

Gender: Unfortunately, women seem to be more vulnerable to lung cancer. Research has shown that female smokers are more susceptible to the cancer-causing chemicals found in cigarettes. In another study, a gene linked to abnormal lung cancer cell growth was found to be more active in women than in men. It did not matter whether the women smoked or not.

A family history of lung cancer: Evidence suggests that there is a lung cancer gene which predisposes offspring to develop lung cancer. However, the evidence is far from conclusive as the situation is made difficult by the fact that offspring of smokers have been exposed to a smoking environment since childhood and would therefore have a greater risk for developing the disease.

Scarring from previous lung disease : Scarring in lungs caused by tuberculosis or other lung disease can be a risk factor for lung cancer.

Second-hand smoke: Exposure to second-hand smoke has been shown to be a definite risk factor. Your risk increases by 30 percent from daily exposure to second-hand smoke. This is probably the most significant risk factor for lung cancer in non-smokers.

Exposure to radon: Radon is an odorless gas than can seep out of the soil into buildings. Worse yet, the gas can seep from the soil into water near residential communities. Radon has been implicated as a potential cause of lung cancer.

Air pollution: Long-term occupational exposure to diesel exhaust fumes may increase lung cancer risk by 47%. Air pollution in general is a risk factor in the general population. Swedish researchers estimate that as many as 1 in 10 cases of lung cancer may be caused by air pollution in the Swedish capital city, Stockholm.

Past Cancer Treatment: Researchers in Sweden who looked at the medical records of 140,000 breast cancer patients found that there was an increase of lung cancer 5 to 20 years after breast cancer treatment. Suspicion is that radiotherapy in the chest area may have made the lungs more susceptible to the disease.

Estrogen Replacement Therapy: According to researchers at the University of Pittsburg, estrogen may fuel the growth of non small-cell lung cancer.

What preventative measures can we take?

Diet: An apple a day may keep lung cancer away. A Finnish study suggests that apples not only keep doctors away, but provide protection for the lungs as well. This study found that people who ate the most apples were 58 % less likely to develop lung cancer. Other studies suggest that lung cancer risk is lower among smokers and non smokers who ate at least 5 servings of vegetables and fruits daily.

Beta Carotene: A high intake of beta carotene compounds can lower your lung cancer risk; however, studies also show that the beta carotene is only effective when the compounds are ingested from whole foods such as peaches, melon, carrots, mangoes, dark leafy vegetables, squash etc. The opposite effect seems to take place with beta carotene supplements. A Finnish study reported 18% more lung cancer cases among heavy smokers who took beta carotene supplements. And a National Cancer Study on the effects of vitamin A and beta carotene was halted because smokers taking the supplements had 28% more lung cancer than those taking a placebo.

Selenium and Vitamin C: Taking selenium supplements on a long- term basis has been shown to decrease the incidence of lung cancer. In one study, people taking 55-200 mcg of the mineral daily had a 46% lower rate of lung cancer. As well, studies indicate that people who take less than 90 mg of vitamin C on a daily basis may have a 90% higher risk of lung cancer than those who take 140mg or more.

Avoid second-hand smoke and check your house for radon.

There are never guarantees in life, but it makes perfectly good sense to take some preventative measures as these can not only improve your overall quality of health and life but also prevent lung cancer.

Article Source: http://www.klienwachter.com

2006-10-13 17:07:10 · answer #1 · answered by away right now 5 · 3 1

Like the others said, most lung cancer that is found in non-smokers is because of second hand smoke, usually the parent or spouse.

2006-10-14 20:21:35 · answer #2 · answered by kitti_kats_83 2 · 0 0

Genetic predisposition, and exposure to environmental carcinogens are a couple of ways. My great Aunt never smoked, yet she developed lung cancer. She lived in a Paper Mill town in Arkansas, and had also worked out at the Arsenal, where Bio-Chemicals are kept, as well as your normal run of the mill military weaponry. Asbestos was a highly used material in homes and other structures in her day. My mother died of Lung Cancer back in 92. She lived pretty closed to Carbide..aPetrol-Chemical plant. Also, other cancers can migrate to the lungs. Melanoma, for example.

2006-10-14 07:10:01 · answer #3 · answered by Nani 2 · 1 0

There are different forms of lung cancer. The alveolar cell carcinonas are not related to smoking. Some develop around areas of old scarring.

2006-10-14 02:20:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Not all lung cancer is a result of smoke(direct or indirect) .Environmental factors such as contaminants(radon) pollution,estrogen, and genetics also play a role. There are currently studies being done (as with most cancers) to determine biological differences in subjects that help answer the big question. HOW.

2006-10-13 17:15:09 · answer #5 · answered by twildman22 4 · 1 1

actually there are ttwo person one is active smoker(who smokes) & other is passive smoker(who doesnot).
what happens when the non smoker or passive smoker is in a group of active,the smoke actually not inhaled by active because they flew out the smoke out but at the same time thatt smoke is inhaled by passive thatswhy the is more dangerous to non smoker than smokers &leads lungcancer to nonsmoker

2006-10-13 17:10:18 · answer #6 · answered by sunny s 1 · 0 3

Discover How To Quit Smoking - http://Go.QuitSmokingMagics.com

2016-01-29 21:46:15 · answer #7 · answered by Tom 3 · 0 0

While cigarette smoking is an undisputed cause of lung cancer, not all cases of lung cancer occur in smokers or former smokers. Each year, over 170,000 Americans develop lung cancer, and approximately ten per cent of lung cancers, or 17,000 cases, occur in non-smokers. Although not every non-smoker suffering from lung cancer will have an identifiable risk factor for development of the disease, a number of conditions and circumstances have been identified that will increase a non-smoker’s chance of developing lung cancer.

Passive smoking, or the inhalation of tobacco smoke from other smokers sharing living or working quarters, is an established risk factor for the development of lung cancer. Non-smokers who reside with a smoker have a 24% increase in risk for developing lung cancer when compared with other non-smokers. Each year, up to 3,000 lung cancer deaths are estimated to occur in the U.S. that are attributable to passive smoking. For more, please read the The Dangers Secondhand Smoke article.

Radon gas, a naturally-occurring gas that forms when uranium decays, is another known cause of lung cancer. An estimated 12% of total lung cancer deaths in both smokers and non-smokers, or 15,000 to 22,000 lung cancer-related deaths annually in the U.S, are believed to be at least partially related to radon gas exposure. Those who do smoke and are exposed to radon have an even greater risk of developing lung cancer than non-smokers who are exposed to radon gas. Radon gas can travel up through soil and enter homes through gaps in the foundation, pipes, drains, or other openings. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimates that one out of every 15 homes in the U.S. contains dangerous levels of radon gas. Radon gas is invisible and odorless but can be detected with simple test kits. For more, please read the Radon FAQ and Test Your Home for Radon articles.

Asbestos is a compound that was widely used in the past as both thermal and acoustic insulation material. Microscopic fibers of asbestos break loose from the insulation material and are released into the air where they can be inhaled into the lungs. Asbestos fibers can persist for a lifetime in lung tissue following exposure to asbestos. Both lung cancer and a type of cancer known as mesothelioma are associated with exposure to asbestos. Cigarette smoking drastically increases the chance of developing an asbestos-related lung cancer among workers exposed to asbestos; nevertheless, asbestos workers who do not smoke have a five fold greater risk of developing lung cancer than other non-smokers. Today, asbestos use is limited or banned in many countries including the Unites States. For more, please read the Asbestos-Related Disease article.

Since all smokers do not eventually develop lung cancer, it is likely that other factors, such as individual genetic susceptibility, may play a role in the causation of lung cancer. Numerous studies have shown that lung cancer is more likely to occur in both smoking and non-smoking relatives of those who have had lung cancer than in the general population.

Air pollution from vehicles, industry, and power plants, can raise the likelihood of developing lung cancer in exposed individuals. It has been estimated that up to 2,000 lung cancer deaths per year may be attributable to breathing polluted air, and many experts believe that prolonged exposure to highly polluted air can carry a risk for the development of lung cancer similar to that of passive smoking. For more, please read the Deaths Rise with Ground-Level Ozone Warning article.

2006-10-13 17:29:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Passive smoking or by pollution in air.

2006-10-14 00:15:39 · answer #9 · answered by Ravi K 1 · 1 0

If you live in California or New York you can get it just by doing something called 'inhaling'.

2006-10-13 17:03:48 · answer #10 · answered by blazenphoenix 4 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers