There is no concrete evidence to support evolution. People just try to make the pieces fit together like pieces of a puzzle that dont connect. If Darwin never came up with his upsurd theory, all the so called "facts" would have different conclusions. Two researchers can come up with two different conclusions with the same results.
Evolutionists believe our common ancestors are amphibians. Thoughts and comments thank you.
2006-10-13 15:47:56 · 20 answers · asked by daniel 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
THANK YOU!!!! I totally agree! God made the universe, and he made man and everything, scientists didn't have to make crazy ideas of evolution.
2006-10-13 15:51:50 · answer #1 · answered by Christopher 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Very easy to understand: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/educators/teachstuds/svideos.html
You really need to get into college in order to get the best explanation of our current understanding of evolution. Darwin wasn't the only scientist to discover evolution. Jean-Batiste de Lamark, Alfred Russell Wallace, and other scientists independently came to the same conclusions as Darwin. Darwin got the credit because his book offered the most thorough presentation of evolution at the time. There is no debate. We know that evolution occured and continues.
2006-10-13 15:56:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
If a frog turned into a prince, it would be overwhelming evidence against evolution and natural selection. Evolution predicts the exact opposite of that.
2006-10-15 15:13:55 · answer #3 · answered by Mike C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Go back far enough and our common ancestor is a puddle that contained the chemicals that finally came together in the right form (bilipid layer, some DNA or RNA, plus chemicals required for metabolism).
If darwin had not developed the theory of evolution, we probably would only now be figuring it out from the fossils, no more than 20 years ago. However, the advent of genetic testing would have proven it to be a fact, as it has.
Deal with it.
2006-10-13 15:51:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Then wouldn't the frog already turned into a prince?
I really don't like thinking that we were just a bunch of monkeys way back when, but even still I'm not too sure about religion. I don't want to scapegoat, and pick the lesser of two evils, but I rather just stick with religion just to be safe.
2006-10-13 15:50:34 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Try this look at a frog laying on it's back spreading the upper and lower legs, then find a picture of a person in the same position and the similarity's are very real
2006-10-13 15:54:20 · answer #6 · answered by man of ape 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't think that "frogs became into people," whether the scientific theory of evolution makes extra experience than an all understanding, all powerful being turning out to be us in His image to inhabit a tiny planet, orbiting an inconsequential sunlight in an out of ways area of the Universe, on what (whether in no way defined - in all probability by way of conceitedness of the writers of the Bible) can in basic terms be defined as a whim.
2016-10-16 04:23:46 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The easiest thing in the world is to find an absurd example and then to try to make someone else defend it as a "typical" example. (The argumentative term is "Reductio Ad Absurdem" and is typically used by Politicians of all sorts.)
No One claims that the theory of evolution is the final answer to how the world came to be as it is, but we can certainly see evolution at work every day.
Staph bacteria used to be vulnerable to penicillin. The presence of penicillin would weaken its cell walls, causing the germ to "pop". After millions of generations of staph germs, one finally inherited a mutated gene that protected it from this attack. This germ survived to pass its DNA on to future generations, and now most Staph infections require complex cocktails of new generation antibiotics to cure.
This is natural selection at work. A random genetic change gave an organism a better chance at survival, and through its survival and reproduction, it altered its entire species.
If you cannot comprehend the enormity of Time and the complexity of Life, then just say so, but please stop trying to belittle those who can see beyond the ends of their own noses.
2006-10-13 15:59:55 · answer #8 · answered by chocolahoma 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
you're right. but two beings that evolve into one another have to have some relation to the other. for example, humans and apes. even though they appear to be totally different from each other, i guess they found a connection. a frog and a prince... i don't think there ever will be a connection.
2006-10-13 15:51:10 · answer #9 · answered by ♥heartbroken♥ 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The world is concrete evidence of evolution. Evolution is happening around us. Evidence of evolution is under our feet. If you believe that God created the world, why would you deny God's creation?
2006-10-13 19:39:10 · answer #10 · answered by novangelis 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes he can, but only if you bring him in, give him a good home AND name him Prince. lol....no I don't believe the evolution theory
2006-10-13 15:50:46 · answer #11 · answered by cowboys21angel 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋