state the negative effect that couples with no children will have on the food, clothing & automobile industry?

Question

answer should be based on current trends in the marketing industries and the buying power of people, base on their income level.

Answer 1

First off current treads is what is wrong with classical economic theory. Negative effects? Sure if you want to interpret it in a simplistic purely consumption point of view. However couples with no children tend to have more disposable income and therefore spend it in different ways other than processed food, wal-mart and buying mini vans. Economists need to think more in terms of sustainability.

Answer 2

I disagree with DML2410 on some factors. we can assume that those couples have greater income to distribute consistent with individual, yet we can not assure this money is used to directly result the nutrition industry. to declare that the common DINK (Double income No young ones) kinfolk will purchase trendier, greater costly or organic and organic nutrition. Is assuming that those are available of their components and that they are attracted to them as purchases. all of us understand that DINKS make larger purchases greater oftentimes, so as that they are possibly to purchase autos or homes at a lots quicker value than a kin of four. i think of you additionally can assume that their entertainment budgets are larger and due to that they spend additional money on going out to consume. you may no longer assume that DINKS force the fee of things because of fact this type of kinfolk would not make an important factor of the industry, they do signify one that is in a position to purchase luxury products and for this reason merchants pay interest to them. they have procuring skill, no longer industry skill. maybe as babyboomers age this could be a much bigger ingredient, yet for now that is not any longer a driving tension.

Answer 3

supply and Demand! no demand ...sparse supply!