2006-10-13 08:10:45 · 25 answers · asked by STAR POWER=) 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Do you think overpopulation would be such a serious global threat if people weren't having marital sex?
2006-10-13 08:13:15 · answer #1 · answered by Sweetchild Danielle 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This is an excellent question. The answer is obviously NO. AIDS spread very quickly from continent to continent because of individuals having sex very casually. Even in Africa, where the disease originated, is and has always been spread from village to village by a migrant working force. The fact that many now are suffering for the promiscuity of others is sad, but wouldn't have happened without the sexual revolution.
To those who say that it is being spread through other manners, this is true, but the disease wouldn't have even reached the majority of the world (and in fact would have likely died out) if people would have kept their pants on.
2006-10-13 15:17:36 · answer #2 · answered by AT 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ha! So let me get this straight:
Premarital sex caused AIDS?
Nature's random manner to balance overpopulation and eliminate genetically inferior members of a species doesn't factor, right? Drug use and infected transfusions never play a part either? Good monogamous Christians NEVER get AIDS?
Oh, man, that is RICH!
2006-10-13 15:47:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't think that it's as easy as that. I think AIDS would be reduced if people weren't having promiscuous sex. Cuz let's face it, for some people marriage vows don't stop them from having sex with someone other than their spouse.
2006-10-13 15:13:40 · answer #4 · answered by Church Music Girl 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. A lot of the problem is infected men who refuse to wear condoms and insist on having sex with their wives whenever they want.
2006-10-13 15:14:49 · answer #5 · answered by skepsis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
What about blood transfusions?
What about dirty needles (for illicit drug use OR medical purposes in some poorer countries)?
What about spouses who cheat AFTER they are married and then bring their diseases home?
What about rape?
...as much as you would like to pin it on "pre-marital sex" there are too many other factors to deal with here.
2006-10-13 15:14:44 · answer #6 · answered by Ana 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well, of course not. Aids had it's beginning when
people started having multiple partners in sex. As
long as we have prostitutes, adultery, premaritial
sex, gay sex, and other kinds of multiple sex partners,
AIDS will proliferate, and that's a fact.
2006-10-13 15:15:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Plenty of married people are having sex on the side so no that's nothing to do with it. Its if people are promiscuous and having unprotected sex, and that applies to anybody. Men,women, straight, gay, bi, married or single.
2006-10-13 15:18:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course it would, whether or not pre-marital sex is involved should not be the question.THE QUESTION SHOULD BE HOW WILL WE AS A SOCIETY FIND A CURE FOR IT?
2006-10-13 15:18:33 · answer #9 · answered by robert s 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Aids has spread so much because most people don't know how to be satisfied with just one partner, they need to have a little bit of everyone, therefore it spreads.
2006-10-13 15:16:27 · answer #10 · answered by Phoebe 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋