women and children get raped on a daily basis they get infected in the process. do you think that the hiv infected offenders or perpetrators should get lesser sentences when faced by the law to answer for their actions?
2006-10-13 01:03:12 · 25 answers · asked by CAROL M 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
If they know that they have hiv, they should be tried with manslaughter.
2006-10-13 01:05:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe so. Personally I think anyone that has the HIV and puts someone else at risk for infection during the commission of a crime, it should be an aggravated offense.
2006-10-13 01:37:46 · answer #2 · answered by Judge Dredd 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I completely agree such as your opinion. @ Kerry and could: What planet are you from???! Why are you so obsessed that somebody may be put in detention center who's harmless? i could be unsuitable yet i genuinely do no longer think of that occurs very oftentimes. i think of you need to drag your self into the actual worldwide on no account ideas the twenty first century. to this point, the twenty first century has been utter cra.p ! from a criminal offense combating point of view. we've have been given human beings being genuinely kicked to dying interior the streets via finished strangers basically for the offenders to get some years in detention center, out till now their genuinely sentence is done, probable even re-offending lower back. One reliable ingredient i'm able to declare with regard to the twenty first century is that we've DNA sorting out to occasionally instruct whether somebody genuinely has raped or murdered somebody. wherein case do gooders can no longer positioned forward their tiny argument that somebody harmless might get put in penal complex. If that is been DNA shown that somebody is a serial murderer or rapist i do no longer see lots of a clarification why they might't get the dying penalty. there is little need for them to be in this earth. in the event that they are released they seem to be a threat to the popular public and in the event that they are saved in they are overcrowding the prisons as you're saying, and draining the country's economic device.
2016-10-19 07:51:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What kind of question is that? The HIV or AIDs virus is not making them rape people. If anything they should be getting more of a sentence because they signed a death warrant for their victims.
2006-10-13 10:29:15 · answer #4 · answered by Michael R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO I think that the sentence should be longer... in actuality if this person knowing his condition had sex (or raped) they should be put to death. Because the just gave that "victim" a life sentence and they were innocent.
It would be very expensive for us tax payers to pay for their medications while in jail so I think the death penalty would be the answer.
2006-10-13 01:37:31 · answer #5 · answered by razzyrascal 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A bullet to the brain to speed up the AIDS process comes to mind.
Or put them in prison and let nature take it's course and control the prison population at the same time.
Either way works for me.
2006-10-13 01:12:32 · answer #6 · answered by Lucianna 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It should not matter one way or the other. But if any group should be treated harsher, it should be the HIV and AIDS people.
They should be rounded up and their illness should be aggressively treated in a controlled facility with full expectation of cure and release when appropriate.
2006-10-13 01:08:51 · answer #7 · answered by Paul K 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No i do not think that they should get a lesser sentence because of their status.
I think just the opposite, they should get a stiffer sentence because of their status. they know what the disease will do to someone, because it is happening to them. Yet they decide to do whatever it is they are going to do and will infect someone else willingly. that is premeditated murder as far as i am concerned, that that carrys the penalty of death.
2006-10-13 01:08:36 · answer #8 · answered by whatelks67 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No definitely not! Thankfully I live in a state( Fla.) where chemical castration and counseling are required for those convicted of
predatory sexual crimes. In fact at our state facility several
inmates are being held beyond thier terms for refusing to
complete the program.
2006-10-13 01:23:26 · answer #9 · answered by Farnham the Freeholder 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why would you lesson the sentence?..seems to me that the sentence should be increased (and often is) for willfully infecting someone...oh and boys and men get raped as well
2006-10-13 01:06:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
here the offender get charged with attempted murderfor infecting someone with aids.
2006-10-13 01:10:38 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋