my thought is that it should not be done.
2006-10-12 23:41:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Moinu 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think if the person has clearly stated previously to their illness or accident that they do not wish to be kept on life support, their wishes should be honored. Otherwise, I think all reasonable medical actions should be taken. In cases where the family has to decide, may God guide them and comfort them. I do not favor euthanasia as a policy, but I do support an individual's right to choose to die rather than suffer without hope of recovery.
2006-10-12 23:46:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by Smiley 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm against it in principle but I do have reservations. I tend to believe that life's hardships should be faced to the bitter end because they happen for a purpose but I would accept the right of someone with constant pain and a terminal illness to end their life.
2006-10-12 23:27:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
all for it if somebody has a disease such as motor neurons or something similar. No point anyone going through 2 years of pain waiting to die.
2006-10-12 23:27:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by survival_paul 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i does no longer have a concern with it if i knew there have been standards, situations, and steps in the previous they might pass by way of with the approach. by ability of that I recommend having all family contributors counseled, will regarded after out, an entire understand-how of the approach, and an ailment from which they might't get better that thoroughly impacts their high quality of existence.
2016-10-02 06:20:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm an advocate of the right to die with dignity. However, the choice must be carefully considered by a mentally competent patient and if not him/her, then by those close to the patient who can represent them.
2006-10-12 23:27:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Glory Box♥ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am for it if it means ending a person's suffering. Nobody should continue to suffer with no cure in sight or way to improve.
2006-10-13 01:32:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by JistheRealDeal 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe that it is the right of a terminally ill person to end their life, but only if it means ending terrible pain that cannot otherwise be prevented.
2006-10-12 23:33:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's necessary. Especially if the patient want it to end the suffering. I think it's a good thing if it is practised correctly.
2006-10-12 23:30:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by Ellan M 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
there are times where its extremely appropriate.
but theres the problem of in the practical world, this would very likely lead to less-appropriate applications of the same mechanisms.
2006-10-12 23:28:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i am in complete favour of it. i have seen some close relations suffer through terminal illnesses, and slowly and painfully die..i personally would want to die in peace and end all my suffering.
2006-10-12 23:46:53
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋