Have the US military encouraged the anarchy in Iraq?..?

Question

..and is that their excuse for them to stay - permanently?

I mean - permanently.

Answer 1

i don't think it was the governments intention to establish anarchy. they aren't that smart. if you follow the bush family you will see a "get rich quick" pattern trying to emerge but they all are way to nose deep in the cocaine to follow through with anything. you can't fix stupid but you can vote them out of office.

Answer 2

Of course not. We, the American people, have forced our military to be wimps. We are 100% responsible for what's happening.

Plus, we the American people choose to believe the BS that the lame-steam media force feeds us. The truth is different. We are making a difference. We are improving life in Iraq. But no one looks at that, because that doesn't support the George Soros agenda.

If we wanted to, we could stop the war in a year or so by taking the gloves off. War is messy stuff. Kill enough people, and the conscience of the masses will change in our favor.

Answer 3

The excuse that we use for staying in Iraq, is that there is too much instability. As long as there is the instability, we have a reason to be there. I don't think that the military is trying very hard to quell the violence. That would eliminate their need there.

Answer 4

The military does not run the government. Big business runs the government. It is the interest of big business to have a peaceful Iraq and keep the oil flowing.

Answer 5

Good question + America works for Israel and Israel likes a divided and weak Iraq

Answer 6

Nah. The general would have quickly been fired or quit if it was WWII and 10,000+ Englishmen died every day.

Answer 7

Yes. It is very clear.