English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

26 answers

People tend to forget this. Allah yihdeehum. (May God lead them down the straight path.)

2006-10-12 15:26:37 · answer #1 · answered by ←Betty B→ 2 · 2 1

Yes, nice to see some truth here!! Thanks

For we are His workmanship created in Christ Jesus for good works which God prepared beforehand so that we would walk in them. Ephesians 2:10

For the arms of the wicked will be broken
But the Lord sustains the righteous Psalm 37:17

God Bless you my friend

2006-10-12 22:26:52 · answer #2 · answered by redeemed 5 · 1 1

(1:2)
All praise is due to God alone, the sustainer of all the worlds

الْحَمْدُ للّهِ رَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ

2006-10-12 22:33:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Do you know that "God" is a muddled, empty concept utterly devoid of meaning and should be treated as such?

In regards to identity (or “Form” as others have called it), we shall provide the following definitions to the kinds of attributes an existent has which comprises its overall identity:

• Primary Attributes—or fundamental character of a thing, may be defined as the basic nature a particular thing is composed of. What a thing is, specifically, that it may do particular things or affect those around it in a particular way. The following two types of attributes provided below can only be applied to a thing if they can be related to an existent’s primary attribute and the primary attribute is positively identified (this will be explained more extensively later in this article17).
• Secondary Attributes—the character traits or abilities a particular thing may enact or possess. examples: being generous, kind, powerful, wise.
• Relational Attributes—(or ‘Contextualizability’) This is the ability of an entity to relate to other things; to interact, affect, or be connected in some such way. Causality, for instance, is an example of relationships between objects. Comparison is another (ex: that tree is ‘taller’ than me). Further examples would include the descriptions of a thing as “superior”, “inferior”, or “creator”.

In regards to the statement in (1), the inquirer may ask why it is that (2) and (3) are dependent upon the recognition of (1). As mentioned, this is because no possible relation could be established between a concept and its properties if the existent’s metaphysical identity, or primary attribute, remains unidentified.

let us take a look at how the theist answers our question of what, precisely, they mean when they use the term “God.”
There are a number of answers that are provided, due to the subjective coherence amongst person to person. The general responses, however, can be summed up with the following descriptions.
God Is:
• The Most High
• The Creator
• Omnipotent
• Omniscient
• A Supernatural Being
• That Being Whose Power Is Equal To His Will18
• All-Loving
• Our Father
• Our Redeemer
• The Most Beneficent And Merciful
• The Ruler Of The Universe
• Etc…
As we’ve seen, however, none of these descriptions actually answer our question. (1), (2), (5), (10), and (11) are all relational attributes—dealing with comparisons between whatever the theist means by the term “God” and the universe, or humanity in general. The remaining premises are secondary in nature, observing what abilities or characteristic traits “God” has as a result of His metaphysical nature as an existent. But what “God” is as a metaphysical being—the primary attribute of the term itself, remains unprovided.

Thus, we can see that the term “God” suffers from the same problem as the term “Soul”. It is because of this that the theistic position fails on a fundamental level, as the term they are expressing has been provided no referent with which we can judge it’s coherency. Without a primary attribute applied to the term, no relational or secondary attributes can apply. One can speculate on the attributes of the term “God” if they are defining the term via route of hypothesis, but supposing that Mr. Tremblay’s critique of such a position stands firm, they cannot do this. So, from the position of Definition-Based Non-Cognitivism – it simply makes no sense to apply attributes such as “unicity”, or “loving”, or “all-powerful” when one does not know whether or not undefined referent of the term itself is even capable or related to such things by virtue of its fundamental character.

2006-10-12 22:22:18 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

Nonsense. My parents created me and there is nothing supernatural sustaining me.

2006-10-12 22:25:10 · answer #5 · answered by i luv teh fishes 7 · 1 3

Yes.

2006-10-12 22:27:43 · answer #6 · answered by ACC 2 · 1 1

Which God, the Biblical God or Alla, the Mohamed God?

2006-10-12 22:23:21 · answer #7 · answered by interficio_pravus 2 · 1 3

Yes....
Speaking of Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul writes:

Colossians 1:15 Who is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of every creature:
16 For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:
17 And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.
18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence.
19 For it pleased the Father that in him should all fulness dwell;

2006-10-12 22:19:49 · answer #8 · answered by Bob L 7 · 4 6

yes i do.

but do you beleive in this? -- "God helps those who help themselves".

have a nice day and peace.

2006-10-12 22:37:18 · answer #9 · answered by marissa 5 · 0 0

God is my all. Yes i do know for sure.

2006-10-12 22:21:47 · answer #10 · answered by Lover of my soul 5 · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers