p.s.
i dont want a history lesson here.
2006-10-12 14:42:53 · 7 answers · asked by enrique r 2 in Sports ➔ Martial Arts
Usually almost as good as BJJ guys. There are a few more restrictions in Judo competition than BJJ so, if the competition is under BJJ grappling rules, then theres a slight edge to BJJ.
2006-10-12 14:48:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
The term "grappling competition" is pretty vague. If they were competing with judo rules, the judo practitioner would have the advantage, and vise versa with bjj rules.
2006-10-12 15:21:23 · answer #2 · answered by Ryan A 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both disciplines are about even,
Judo relies more on the submission or pinning techniques to win over the opponent.
Jujitsu allows some punching and elbow strikes to keep the opponents distracted, while you get into position for a submission or pin technique.
2006-10-13 07:31:42 · answer #3 · answered by quiksilver8676 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm going to go for a mixture of what Frank and Eyeshine said. As Frank said one of the surest way to counter wrestlers, grapplers and throwers is to be a wrestler, grappler or thrower. However, that is a five year process and you're still going to lose if they're better at it than you are. As Eyeshine pointed out don't let them touch you is a damn good method of successfully countering a grappler, wrestler or thrower. No martial art is guaranteed to be able to counter another but each has a method, what you have to do is learn that method and repeatedly face off against practitioners of the martial arts in question to learn how to apply it. Learn by doing.
2016-03-28 07:01:42 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not well in no gi. Even in gi I have not lost to a judo guy.
2006-10-12 16:42:19 · answer #5 · answered by Joe B 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All things being equal...BJJ will smoke a judoka.
2006-10-12 20:34:49 · answer #6 · answered by Edward 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In Pride FC some of them have held their own.
2006-10-12 15:59:07 · answer #7 · answered by xian w 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋