That they were no longer sexually attracted to you but they still want to be with you would you stay in the relationship?
2006-10-12 14:17:28 · 27 answers · asked by candidworker 5 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
I dont have this problem I was just asking
2006-10-12 14:25:19 · update #1
if s e x was still important to you - it would be time for a transformation or a new relationship that included wild passionate monkey love!
Candidworker, there is no reason to not have it all in this little life of ours, none... you can the relationship, the life that has meaning and have your a s s and p u s s y enthusiatically eaten not less then 5 times a week!
2006-10-13 08:08:19 · answer #1 · answered by zigzagidiot 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
evaluate the purpose of the relationship in the first place. Significant other sounds so vague anyway..... if sex in the relationship is important to the person then move on. f it is not something that is highly valued in the relationship then its a decision that should be based on other factors. How well does the couple know each other? what are some other things the couple does together to strengthen the relationship? Could you consider being just friends... friends with out a sexual relationship.
2006-10-12 21:32:26 · answer #2 · answered by nature79 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If there was no attraction, what would be the point? The physical part of the relationship is just as imoportant as any other part. Being physical helps you connect. Why would you want to be with someone who tells you that they aren't attracted to you sexually? Physicality doesn't make a relationship, but it sure can break one. I don't think I would stay if there was no chance of physical encounters.
2006-10-12 21:25:34 · answer #3 · answered by Special K 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would ask him why first; then ask if you can fix it somehow. If you can be with him, knowing that he's not sexually attracted to you, but still wants to be with you then you should stay with him. If not then say that it isn't working for you, and you should just stay friends.
2006-10-12 21:27:30 · answer #4 · answered by luvcry247 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Then it's time to let go.
Sexual attraction is one of the prime ingredients of a healthy relationship. It's the salt and pepper of tht great dish called love. Without sex, love would be plain and flat.
If the other guy/ girl tells you this, then it's just time to move on.
2006-10-12 21:20:23 · answer #5 · answered by caterpillar 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If he is not sexually attracted to you then he doesn't love you. Why would you stay with a man life that. You deserve better move on with you life and find someone who loves and wants to be with you...Good Luck
2006-10-12 21:24:28 · answer #6 · answered by SpecialLdy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is a significant other? I will suppose it is not a spouse,which makes it quit easy.. I would not stay in the relationship. I would leave quickly and quietly and be glad he told me so I would not be wasting any more of my valuable time with him.
2006-10-12 21:23:01 · answer #7 · answered by lily 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've heard of the other person staying even when someone goes to their online journal and says loud and proud how gay they are and how angry their spouse makes them with the crazy things they do....
2006-10-12 21:19:52 · answer #8 · answered by *babydoll* 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no no no and no
it's a waste of time .
for that sinificant other to fall in love with you again could take years.. life is short and if they tell you taht believe me it's over... and it has been for quite a while. because it takes time to be able to say that to the other person if you mean it.
2006-10-12 21:20:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would say end it. if they still wanna be with you but arent sexually attracted to you, they will cheat and you will get hurt. you dont want that
2006-10-12 21:30:51 · answer #10 · answered by blu3_p1x1_st1x 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋