yes God exists or you would not be here to ask this
and God wrote the Bible
Man wrote up what they think the laws of science are and keep going OOPS that was wrong and rewriting them
2006-10-13 03:12:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Noble Angel 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes God exist but how to prove it is the real question. What you dismiss as proof, by faith I will accept. Then the question is really about faith isn't it. Who does one prove faith? You can see it? (or can you) You can't measure it? (or can you) So then how do you know it is real? I can't answer that one for you and I won't try. Faith only comes when one is willing to believe in things not seen, or measured, touched or felt. It is silliness to those that choose not to believe it. Okay time to agree to disagree but nothing to lose a friendship over.
Science, hmmm? Did the God of creation break the law of science? Or did the God of creation create the law of science?
As creation science had to start somewhere and for a God of creation to creation it had to be based on something? Right?
Why is it not realistic to think that a God that can create the universe could not also create science law at the same time?? Is that too far out of real? I don't think so. The building blocks had tom come from somewhere. Is it unrealistic to think that God could have created without also creating scientific law.
I for one could not follow some magical god that did not have the ability to create the universe without installing the building blocks first.
Science tells us a lot but even science is not a 100% right all the time. How many times have thing that we thought were right been proved wrong by the same science? But to me that doesn't matter what matters is science shows the building block that God used in the creation. Doen't matter if it was 6 24hr days or 6 billion year long days. Do you know what a day is to God? I don't. That goes back to that funny little word, faith. Faith in science or God or even both.
2006-10-12 14:31:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dead Man Walking 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
If a law of science is broken, then it was not a law to begin with. Scientists will admit that there are no scientific laws we can be sure of. However, the statistical probability of some theories (such as the Law of Conservation of Energy) is so high that scientists are comfortable treating it as an absolute truth.
You may be aware that the "Law of Gravity" has been "broken". Gravity is unable to explain certain effects at the quantum and at the universal levels. We "lovingly" call it a law, because we have for so long, and because we do not have a better theory to replace it.
Most science now avoids the term "law". Instead, we have theories that do the best job of explaining. The theory of evolution does the best at explaining the billions of variations of species.
2006-10-12 14:13:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Math Guy 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
How does one break the laws of science? That may be the toughest question you've ever asked. I'm stumped. Saying the laws of science can't be broken just because they're the laws of science sounds too much like the arguement that God exists because he has always existed. It's not an arguement at all, just dodging the real question. I don't know how to answer this.
Call NASA, ask for the FTL (faster than light) division, see how they're coming along.
2006-10-12 14:09:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kenny ♣ 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
1: We cannot possibly know with the knowledge we have gathered so far.
2: A Scientific law is just a hypothesis that has gone so long without being disproved that it has been accepted as true. However, evidence can still be brought forth to disprove them. There's really no such thing as a scientific law...
2006-10-12 14:08:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Shinkirou Hasukage 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
hi! ur question really needs thinking so i'll try to give u what i know ,first god does exist , so tell me who created the whole universe?who created u?
in our religion(islam) we believe that he is one, unique, incomparable God, Who has no son nor partner, and that none has the right to be worshipped but Him alone.In the Quran, God describes Himself:
Say, “He is God, the One. God, to Whom the creatures turn for their needs. He begets not, nor was He begotten, and there is none like Him.” (Quran, 112:1-4)
God alone is the Almighty, the Creator, the Sovereign, and the Sustainer of everything in the whole universe. He manages all affairs. He stands in need of none of His creatures, and all His creatures depend on Him for all that they need. He is the All-Hearing, the All-Seeing, and the All-Knowing.
about science and religion also our religion doesn't contradict science on the contrary it proves it ,wait i'll give u proof just one or two but there r more : koran and cerebrum God has said in the Quran about one of the evil unbelievers who forbade the Prophet Muhammad from praying at the Kaaba:
No! If he does not stop, We will take him by the naseyah (front of the head), a lying, sinful naseyah (front of the head)! (Quran, 96:15-16)
Why did the Quran describe the front of the head as being lying and sinful? Why didn’t the Quran say that the person was lying and sinful? What is the relationship between the front of the head and lying and sinfulness?
If we look into the skull at the front of the head, we will find the prefrontal area of the cerebrum ,What does physiology tell us about the function of this area? A book entitled Essentials of Anatomy & Physiology says about this area, “The motivation and the foresight to plan and initiate movements occur in the anterior portion of the frontal lobes, the prefrontal area. This is a region of association cortex...” Also the book says, “In relation to its involvement in motivation, the prefrontal area is also thought to be the functional center for aggression....” So, this area of the cerebrum is responsible for planning, motivating, and initiating good and sinful behavior and is responsible for the telling of lies and the speaking of truth. Thus, it is proper to describe the front of the head as lying and sinful when someone lies or commits a sin, as the Quran has said, “...A lying, sinful naseyah (front of the head)!” Scientists have only discovered these functions of the prefrontal area in the last sixty years, according to Professor Keith L. Moore.3
The Quran on the Origin of the Universe:
The science of modern cosmology, observational and theoretical, clearly indicates that, at one point in time, the whole universe was nothing but a cloud of ‘smoke’ (i.e. an opaque highly dense and hot gaseous composition). This is one of the undisputed principles of standard modern cosmology. Scientists now can observe new stars forming out of the remnants of that ‘smoke’.
The illuminating stars we see at night were, just as was the whole universe, in that ‘smoke’ material. God has said in the Quran:
Then He turned to the heaven when it was smoke... (Quran, 41:11)
Because the earth and the heavens above (the sun, the moon, stars, planets, galaxies, etc.) have been formed from this same ‘smoke,’ we conclude that the earth and the heavens were one connected entity. Then out of this homogeneous ‘smoke,’ they formed and separated from each other. God has said in the Quran:
Have not those who disbelieved known that the heavens and the earth were one connected entity, then We separated them?... (Quran, 21:30)
Dr. Alfred Kroner is one of the world’s renowned geologists. He is Professor of Geology and the Chairman of the Department of Geology at the Institute of Geosciences, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany. He said: “Thinking where Muhammad came from . . . I think it is almost impossible that he could have known about things like the common origin of the universe, because scientists have only found out within the last few years, with very complicated and advanced technological methods, that this is the case.” (To view the RealPlayer video of this comment click here in the site ). Also he said: “Somebody who did not know something about nuclear physics fourteen hundred years ago could not, I think, be in a position to find out from his own mind, for instance, that the earth and the heavens had the same origin.”
well! iam sorry i took that long but i really wanted to express my opinion.
i wish it helped.
if u are interested the site :islam guid .com has the real player vidio and pic and other miricals .
iam not laying c it ur self.
sorry again.
2006-10-12 14:42:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
You are on to something now. Laws of Science are written by whom? Humans. Since we did not create the existence of the event we can not make the rules.
If the one who can make the rules decides to changes things we call it a anomaly at best or claim a new law.
2006-10-12 14:16:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by mike g 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
God exists and established the "laws of science." As he is the creator, he has the ability and right to suspend those laws if he so chooses. I am talking about miracles now. Jesus Christ performed numerous miracles to prove his divinity to the people around him.
2006-10-13 13:45:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kidd! 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
god exists. one could break a law of science either by not being subjected to the laws of science i.e. a paranormal being in which case the law exists in exclusion of the paranormality of that being, or if what you percieve to be scientific law is untrue in which case depending on your definition of scientific law it was or wasn't to begin with.
2006-10-12 14:17:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by nicejewishguy 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
god only exists because all that is is what their would be if their was a god - the god construct, like ourselves and our personalities, is (in our most fundamantal state) a hologram
this whole thing is created by thought
2006-10-12 14:13:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by -skrowzdm- 4
·
0⤊
1⤋