When you look at everything in the world, a car, computer, building, ect: you know that somone had to build or create it, Why do people wonder if there is a God or not when everything requires a creater?
2006-10-12 09:58:09 · 19 answers · asked by jayr 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I'm afraid your mistaken. The law of conservation of matter and energy clearly states that matter and energy cannot be created nor destroyed; it can only be changed from one state to another. This means that the material and energy needed for a car, computer, building, etc. already existed; we simply changed it from one state to another state to suit our purposes. You can change matter into energy. You can change energy into matter. You can take rocks, sand, and minerals, and turn them into things like concrete, microchips, and wires. Sometimes changes occur because conditions are right. In any case, nothing needs creating, since matter and energy exist infinitely, in one form or another; negating the need for a creator.
2006-10-12 10:03:29 · answer #1 · answered by digitalquirk 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
God is eternal and uncreated and if God became created, then He ought to not be God. So he's a self existent eternal being. God is a non-created being who lives exterior of time and area. See 2 Peter 3:8, Isaiah 40 3:13; John a million:3; Isaiah 40 two:5 and Jeremiah 10:12; Isaiah 40 six:10.
2016-10-16 03:12:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh, for crying out loud. Not this again.
If everything requires a creator, who created God? Why is it necessary that everything require a creator? Is it not possible that the universe has simply always existed and always will?
2006-10-12 10:01:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
You said everything requires a creator... therefore, you are intelligent enough to realize that the being humans call "God" or Jehovah/Yahweh was actually created by something else. At least I hope you are.
2006-10-12 10:00:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
If complexity demands a creator, then your creator demands a creator and so on... This argument can only be used to support polythism, not monotheism.
And also: you have failed to establish that the world required a "creator"...
2006-10-12 10:04:34 · answer #5 · answered by Blackacre 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The creator was the primeval atom at the time of the big bang.
And what was before that? Not a meaningful question. Time started from that point.
2006-10-12 10:08:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
In as much as I was not around to see how everything came into being (and neither were you),I say, "I don't know ..... YET!" To assume that some god, my less than intellectual ancestors made up, instantaneously farted the universe into being, is absurd
2006-10-12 10:13:08 · answer #7 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because all of those things you mentioned can be proven. How they were built, by whom, etc. You just expect everyone to believe that "God" is real? No one knows where he or she came from, no one can prove he or she did anything! There is no evidence there is a God.
A Creator is believable, not God.
2006-10-12 10:01:06 · answer #8 · answered by Starla_C 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Interesting...everything you pointed out that requires a creator is an inanimate object, ie, not ALIVE.
Apples and oranges budddy. cant compare my "creation" to that of a car, TV, plane or anything else.
2006-10-12 10:00:39 · answer #9 · answered by YDoncha_Blowme 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Cars and computers are made up of atoms. Where did atoms come from? Were they created or have they always been here? It can go either way.
2006-10-12 10:01:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋