Is this a contradiction in terms ?
2006-10-12 09:26:41 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
LOL! My husband is in the army, and even we make that joke.
2006-10-12 09:34:28 · answer #1 · answered by armywifetp 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It is no more oxymoronic than "Conservative Democrat" or "Smart Bomb"
The Military Intelligence people did a tremendous job during the cold war and then they were all but disbanded. They are just now being built back up to respectable levels.
The probable in my very pragmatic estimation in Iraq was that we relied too heavily on Technology such as spy satellites and had little or no intelligence gather forces on the ground in country of our own. Therefore we had to rely on the forces of other countries. Had we had intelligence forces on the ground in Iraq like we did in Russia and other communist countries during the cold war the results would have been quite different.
2006-10-12 10:56:29 · answer #2 · answered by barrettins 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Neil H and IQ over 80? Is this a contradiction in terms?
2006-10-12 11:40:42 · answer #3 · answered by blueprairie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
smart neil h. there's a contradiction in terms.
You shouldn't disrespect Military like that. If you're so intelligent why aren't you fighting for your own freedom?
2006-10-12 09:36:04 · answer #4 · answered by laurel 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes! even the highest levels of government spies have left all there
information on the internet to be tracked world wide. If you know how
you could tell where every cia office, british intelligence and mossad
have there offices. The government can hunt people , but the people
can also hunt the spies. CIA Monteray, California. Almost everthing
goes through, NSA, CIA and Microsoft. Find out who has the largest
computer network in a company other then microsoft, Maybe they
sell discounted items. Maybe they are a spy?
2006-10-12 09:34:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
don't disrespect the military, they are not perfect but deserve our respect and support.....i think you may actually be referring to the intelligence community which even though it is under the arm of the military is actually run by the fbi, cia and those types....consider their intelligence that led to the iraq war...would you trust them? maybe its not a contradiction but it certainly is lacking
2006-10-12 09:30:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It is indeed an oxymoron of the highest level. Need proof: try Iraq and if you don't like that, go back to VietNam.
2006-10-12 09:36:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
TS isn't confusing... in case you're sparkling. that's in basic terms time-ingesting... and intense priced for the militia. in case you have lived in one section all your existence, in case you have worked for few agencies, in case you have a small circle of acquaintances and acquaintances, it might desire to bypass notably quickly. yet once you have moved around plenty, been to somewhat some faculties, bounced from business enterprise to business enterprise, it might desire to take a protracted time. Your criminal record... or lack thereof... is easy to verify. that's the persons with whom you have had touch for the time of your existence. the main time-ingesting attempt you face is itemizing all of the places you have lived, the faculties you have attended, the agencies to which you belong(ed), the places you have worked--and supervisors' names, and human beings you have known. figuring out them is the user-friendly section. Addresses, telephone numbers, and dates is the no longer common section.
2016-12-26 17:40:01 · answer #8 · answered by mandeville 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not at all, if you think our intel is bad... look at the next guy
may not be the best, but its better than the other guys
2006-10-12 09:34:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Uh, No.
You wouldn't be living in a free nation if it wasn't for military intelligence, duh.
2006-10-12 09:30:21 · answer #10 · answered by Jasmine 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋