the years of the age of the ice when it has been proven that ice can melt and refreeze 3 and 4 times in a week? thelastsquadron.com says that plans left there in 1944 have 268 feet of ice on them..at this rate the ice would have to be over 25000 feet thick just since the flood of Noah.. oh wait it is isn't it... How long do you think that it will take before someone tries to say that the gaseous deposits in the ice are different when they know full well that that particular point of veiw has been disporven...
2006-10-12 08:56:14 · 5 answers · asked by 57chevy 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
"an astonishing 268 feet of ice had accumulated over them, and they had been carried three miles by the drifting glacier"
You neglected to account for lateral movement. At that rate, the ice would have reached the sea, calved icebergs, and melted long ago. This is clearly not the ancient icepack of the inland of northern Greenland.
It must be convenient to be able to reduce the largest island in the world to a homogenous speck. I could prove anthing if I played as fast and loose with the facts as you did. Why did you mispell your source website? What didn't you want people to find out?
2006-10-12 14:18:09 · answer #1 · answered by novangelis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Evolutionists? Oh, you mean people who believe their own eyes and the overwhelming evidence that evolution took place and is still taking place. I am not disputing the existance of a Creator. It sure does explain a lot of things. If we were all creationist with our heads in the sand we would not have achieved the technological advances we all take for granted these days.
2006-10-12 09:17:29 · answer #2 · answered by al f 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
But we can agree that there are 'ice rings', right (layers of ice)? So... how do they appear? How do you explain them? If there's ten layers of 'ice rings', what can we say about the age of that ice?
See, this is how you learn. You ask questions and you try to answer them. You're just a bystander, complaining at what we find.
This is also why God is not allowed in Science, because you can just answer *any* question with "God did it".
2006-10-12 09:21:10 · answer #3 · answered by ThePeter 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
At least evolutionists are out there testing their theorys. They dont sit back and say " Because thats the way it was created"
They at least try to find the answers instead of believeing some big scary guy in the sky did it for them.
2006-10-12 09:07:48 · answer #4 · answered by wilchy 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, why don't you ask in the science category, I'm not a geologist.
2006-10-12 09:02:54 · answer #5 · answered by Allison L 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋