2006-10-12 03:06:31 · 17 answers · asked by OKUZ A 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No, they were only about 1600 years apart
2006-10-12 03:08:56 · answer #1 · answered by aliciarox 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Mona Lisa was a portrait painted in the 15th or 16th century (my memory has failed me... I THINK it was the 15th century). It is not possible for Mona Lisa to be the daughter of anyone who lived 1,500 (give or take) years before her.
2006-10-12 03:09:10 · answer #2 · answered by Iamnotarobot (former believer) 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
since when has mona lisa become a religious figure...did i sleep through something...i must have missed something here
just like religion and politics..
religion and art do not go hand in hand
2006-10-12 03:10:01 · answer #3 · answered by tiff 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no...she isn't. and interesting fact just recently discovered...mona lisa was pregnant or had just given birth when posing for the picture
2006-10-12 03:15:03 · answer #4 · answered by biffer84 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jesus' only daughters name was Sara as stated by the Da Vinci code which is where i get all my knowledge of religion from.
2006-10-12 03:09:19 · answer #5 · answered by Big Rudy 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Mona Lisa is a MAN!!!!!!!!!!1
2006-10-12 03:08:51 · answer #6 · answered by DrPepper 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Jesus never had children . The da vinci code is a hoax.
2006-10-12 03:10:45 · answer #7 · answered by Kate T. 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it IS possible, they look almost the same... she may be his and mary magdalene's descendant, and that might be why da vinci would have painted her, he might have thought that we might notice the similarities between the two paintings (the one with the dinner and mona)
2006-10-12 03:11:57 · answer #8 · answered by Everlost 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a Da Vinci painting, thought to possibly be a self portrait.
2006-10-12 03:08:04 · answer #9 · answered by . 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
is Elvis living in the rocky mountains with Marilyn Monroe?
2006-10-12 03:09:00 · answer #10 · answered by ggroess 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋