English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

22 answers

God is a spirit, he has no color. you have to have faith

2006-10-12 00:45:41 · answer #1 · answered by lover of Jehovah and Jesus 7 · 1 3

God: The Imaginary Puppeteer


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All the religions believe that God created the world and also mankind. But if you are created by someone, you are only a puppet, you don't have your own soul. And if you are created by somebody, he can uncreate you any moment. He neither asked you whether you wanted to be created, nor is he going to ask you: "Do you want to be uncreated?"

God is the greatest dictator, if you accept the fiction that he created the world and also created mankind. If God is a reality, then man is a slave, a puppet. All the strings are in his hands, even your life. Then there is no question of any enlightenment. Then there is no question of there being any Gautam the Buddha, because there is no freedom at all. He pulls the strings, you dance; he pulls the strings, you cry; he pulls the strings, you start murders, suicide, war. You are just a puppet and he is the puppeteer.

Then there is no question of sin or virtue, no question of sinners and saints. Nothing is good and nothing is bad, because you are only a puppet. A puppet cannot be responsible for its actions. Responsibility belongs to someone who has the freedom to act.


Either God can exist or freedom, both cannot exist together.


That is the basic implication of Friedrich Nietzsche's statement: God is dead, therefore man is free.

No theologian, no founder of religions thought about this, that if you accept God as the creator, you are destroying the whole dignity of consciousness, of freedom, of love. You are taking all responsibility from man, and you are taking all his freedom away. You are reducing the whole of existence to just the whim of a strange fellow called God.

But Nietzsche's statement is bound to be only one side of the coin. He is perfectly right, but only about one side of the coin. He has made a very significant and meaningful statement, but he has forgotten one thing, which was bound to happen because his statement is based on rationality, logic and intellect. It is not based on meditation.

Man is free, but free for what? If there is no God and man is free, that will simply mean man is now capable of doing anything, good or bad; there is nobody to judge him, nobody to forgive him. This freedom will be simply licentiousness.

There comes the other side. You remove God and you leave man utterly empty. Of course, you declare his freedom, but to what purpose? How is he going to use his freedom creatively, responsibly? How is he going to avoid freedom being reduced to licentiousness?

Friedrich Nietzsche was not aware of any meditations -- that is the other side of the coin.


Man is free, but his freedom can only be a joy and a blessing to him if he is rooted in meditation.


Remove God -- that is perfectly okay, he has been the greatest danger to human freedom -- but give man also some meaning and significance, some creativity, some receptivity, some path to find his eternal existence.

Zen is the other side of the coin. Zen does not have any God, that's its beauty.

But it has a tremendous science to transform your consciousness, to bring so much awareness to you that you cannot commit evil. It is not a commandment from outside, it comes from your innermost being. Once you know your center of being, once you know you are one with the cosmos -- and the cosmos has never been created, it has been there always and always, and will be there always and always, from eternity to eternity -- once you know your luminous being, your hidden Gautam Buddha, it is impossible to do anything wrong, it is impossible to do anything evil, it is impossible to do any sin.

Friedrich Nietzsche in his last phase of life became almost insane. He was hospitalized, kept in a mad asylum. Such a great giant, what happened to him? He had concluded: "God is dead," but it is a negative conclusion. He became empty, but his freedom was meaningless. There was no joy in it because it was only freedom from God, but for what? Freedom has two sides: from and for. The other side was missing. That drove him insane.

Emptiness always drives people insane. You need some grounding, you need some centering, you need some relationship with existence. God being dead, all your relationship with existence was finished. God being dead, you were left alone without roots. A tree cannot live without roots, nor can you.

God was non-existential, but it was a good consolation. It used to fill people's interior, although it was a lie. But even a lie, repeated thousands and thousands of times for millennia, becomes almost a truth. God has been a great consolation to people in their fear, in their dread, in their awareness of old age and death, and beyond -- the unknown darkness.

2006-10-16 06:52:04 · answer #2 · answered by Krishna 6 · 0 1

GOD is

formless
colourless
odourless

2006-10-15 06:49:53 · answer #3 · answered by pioneer. 2 · 1 1

Hi,
I think god if visible would be BLUE

2006-10-12 12:41:28 · answer #4 · answered by Mona S 2 · 1 3

As the saying goes," the god of donkeys looks like a donkey." God, if He appears in person, will look like you - the asker.

2006-10-12 11:09:05 · answer #5 · answered by KB M 3 · 1 3

GOD is a Spirit but will appear to everyone the way they expect HIM to appear to them. HE might appear to you totally different than to me.

2006-10-12 08:15:35 · answer #6 · answered by Marvin R 7 · 0 2

Definitely my color, brown. Bet?

2006-10-12 14:51:05 · answer #7 · answered by Baby 4 · 1 3

What makes you so sure God is a male?

2006-10-12 07:49:41 · answer #8 · answered by Patricia S 6 · 2 3

you would see him as the ideal of the race you consider yourself.

that is, a black person would look at "him" and see a beautiful black person, a white person would look at "him" and see a beautiful white person... ect. each person would see "him" differently.

sorta like Kosh on Babylon 5, but even moreso.

edit; note that I said him in quotes.... that is that its not *REALLY* "him" but that its more appropriate than say, "it"

2006-10-12 07:49:12 · answer #9 · answered by RW 6 · 1 3

First of all, it is not possible. However, Soul is God, and there is no color of Soul.

2006-10-12 07:54:32 · answer #10 · answered by Jaggi 1 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers