English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do you prefer the pale look or the sunkissed one, im naturally qute pale but am obsessed with being brown all year round (not orange just sunkissed) is it worth the effort?

2006-10-11 21:57:09 · 29 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships Singles & Dating

I have 1 sunbed a week and wear st topez at the weekend.

2006-10-11 22:05:15 · update #1

29 answers

Beach babe in Summer, English rose in winter, they way it was meant to be...

2006-10-11 22:29:02 · answer #1 · answered by Tiger01204 5 · 1 0

English Rose every time. If it's natural, it's good for me. I like natural everything. I mean if you get a tan on holiday then that is fine and it will be a nice change. But I would hate ro go out with a girl who was obsessed about a tan.

2006-10-11 22:12:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

it's not worth it .. sun cancers and wrinkly skin eventually take over the sunkissed babe where as the english rose remains the english rose a lot longer..lol beauty is only skin deep at the end of the day anyways,

2006-10-11 22:00:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

As an English bird who is very pale all year round i must say i agree, i sepnd a small mortgage on St Tropez and i am sick of applying it every night...i want to be sunkissed and exotic looking but i guess we all want to be what we cant...

2006-10-11 21:59:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

In my opinion pale skin is very underrated. Naturally brown skin is lovely (as are all natural skin tones), but porcelain pale, creamy skin is downright striking and doesn't get the love it deserves. Especially in this day and age when everyone is running about bending over backwards to be the colour of a carrot. Just play up your natural skin tone, you can't go wrong.

2006-10-11 22:05:54 · answer #5 · answered by GreySkies 2 · 1 0

i look terrible pale! i was just made to be on holiday permanently! the sunkissed look always (ON ME) looks better! and i'm quite lucky as i go very brown and manage to keep it for such a long time! gotta have a couple of sunbeds too ;)

2006-10-11 22:03:27 · answer #6 · answered by carlaroberts18 3 · 0 0

I no what you mean!!Im natrually quite pale and spend the whole year either on the sun bed or applying fake tan!!I just think a bit of colour looks so much better!On me anyway but i no some really pasty people who can really carry it off!!But for me i would rather be a beach babe!! x

2006-10-11 22:02:19 · answer #7 · answered by jo 4 · 1 0

For me - it depends on many things other than physical appearance, but the english rose is nice. Do not try to chase 'ideals' or become what you are not. My sister is pale and can't tan to save her life - don't go trying and end up wrecking your skin - "be you" ;-))

2006-10-11 22:08:27 · answer #8 · answered by Robbo64 1 · 0 0

I'm pale, i love being pale, i'm worried because i'm going to lanzarotein november and i'll be tanned on all our xmas photos and when i tan it looks totally natural!

Be happy with what you have and if not don't get streaky legs!

2006-10-11 21:58:42 · answer #9 · answered by Andromeda Newton™ 7 · 2 0

nicely tanned- not jodie marsh orange colour though - try using something like dove self tanning lotion - its just the right colour and its natural. But to answer your question - yeah I think its worth the effort. xx

2006-10-11 22:01:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers