the reaction of us against neuclear blast of n korea is to put sangtions through security council.will us react the same way if there is a neuclear blast from iran or it will attack directly with its own army on iran
2006-10-11 20:31:17 · 8 answers · asked by shahidshada 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I think we will skip the sanctions and use forces right away on Iran if it had a nuclear bomb test. I dont know why, but i just have a feeling that that is what would happen.
2006-10-11 20:33:36 · answer #1 · answered by Ilya 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think we will go through the same thing. I don't think it was a nuke that went off in N. Korea though... the tremor wasn't big enough. If you compare it to the tremor after Russia blew up their first one, it was much, much smaller. One thing to keep in mind is that Iran is at least 5 year behind Korea so we won't be talking sanctions because of something like that for a while.
2006-10-11 20:42:56 · answer #2 · answered by beagun0 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jeez...it's not like Bush sits around like an evil movie villain twirling his handlebar mustache all, 'muahhhahaa...who shall we nuke first?!" Ever since Hiroshima, we have never, and will never resort to nukes unless we take a DIRECT HIT. Think about it, even if there was a nuclear standoff, either way, if a nuke comes our way, then a nuke flies their way. The result...nuclear haulocaust. Followed by a nuclear winter and the slow agonizing death of millions.
No rational human being wants this, which is precisely why we've been treading so lightly on this matter ever since Iran started up it's program and NK tested it's nuke.
2006-10-11 21:44:09 · answer #3 · answered by olliebee 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are no chances that U.S. will directly attack on Iran. It will try to solve it diplomatically. Then it will try to put a very very tough Sanctions on the Iran and will pressure the Security Council and have put pressure by the United Nations.
2006-10-11 22:45:09 · answer #4 · answered by pesific_boy_curious_2_no 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
one country at a time. one case at a time. their ambitions and directions could be different. although they are both "sad and worse" cases of disrespect for humanity and humanitarian elements of our small world. nuclear blast is a crazy move -- scientist agree it endangers the environment and humanity and their leader is not an intellectual but a cut throat autocrat who subjugates his people to modern slavery and poorness ( not enough food, no Internet, restrictions of freedom in all its forms but I must admit his soldiers walk in cadence -- very impressive for a children show. How to to compare that scene with the up coming scenario in Iran is anyone's guess. in politics 23 hrs. is equal to a year or more -- sometimes. Hope someone will something will happen before the big boom. g-d forbid.
2006-10-11 21:08:26 · answer #5 · answered by s t 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wish they did that,
Cause the world will then see more US soldiers going home in body bags. they will be involved in not one but many wars at the same time.
The terrorism s h i t will by then be plain US rhetoric, Nobody will care two hoots for it.
The American people will be most unsafe even in thier own homes, cause
The Mulims in general
The Iraqis,
The koreans,
The Iranians,
The tribes of Chavez,
The Cubans,
literally everybody will be looking for an opportunity to kill Amercans in America.
2006-10-11 21:53:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, but it put Japan and Israel on the offense
2006-10-11 22:42:24 · answer #7 · answered by blue_eyed_southernman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Please tell me why this doesn't play right into Chinas hand?
2006-10-11 22:27:05 · answer #8 · answered by Keary 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋