Just the judgement and critical thinking skills.
Also... what is "trex"?
Ooh wait... T-rex. Got it.
2006-10-15 14:33:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
the christians cant produce one peace of dinosaur evidence that has been altered by man
like some sort of leather good like a belt made from some dinosaur skin
you'd think they would if the world was only 6000yrs old
besides that trex soft tissue that's 70 million years old,all other dinosaur evidence is fossilized rock
unicorn your assumption is just wrong
\/ \/ \/
Soft tissue was not supposed to last more than 100k yrs
and if you say
[Either the dinosaur died much more recently]
then you are going to have to produce dinosaur evidence
like this
some sort of leather good like a belt made from some dinosaur skin
because we would be finding such things by now if the world was only 6000yrs old but we dont
2006-10-11 23:20:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Truthasarous rex 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Soft tissue was not supposed to last more than 100k yrs. So finding it in a dinosaur that was supposed to have been dead for 65 million yrs should not be possible. Either the dinosaur died much more recently or the fossil does not deteriorate the way previously assumed. Either way the method used to date these objects is brought into question.
2006-10-11 23:18:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by unicorn 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
if the trex has a tissue i don't want to be there when he has to sneeze
oh and it was the flood that wiped them out 5000 yrs ago
2006-10-11 23:20:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Noble Angel 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Damn! I missed that one. I would love to come up with a good theory to explain it, but I need to know what environment it had been found in, and by whom. It may be a hoax of some kind.
2006-10-12 09:30:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He needs to get back to the fishbowl for a unique view of his world.
2006-10-11 23:15:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by noitall 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I question literacy in America...
2006-10-11 23:15:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by a kinder, gentler me 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
This question shoul be in Zoology not in religion
2006-10-11 23:18:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by jp 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Selective illiteracy, I guess.
2006-10-11 23:16:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm still shaking my head in wonder, after having read his question and seeing his link.
2006-10-11 23:15:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Kathryn™ 6
·
0⤊
2⤋