If evolution is true, then applying leftist idealogy is pure suicide. Agreed?

Question

Evolution ultimately implies a survival of the fittest paradigm.

Because evolution is true, we know that there is no universal code of religious morality and that humans simply act in their own self interest when push comes to shove (as the book lord of the flies illustrates).

Leftist idealogy is a qasi-religious view. Essentially, leftists, like Islamists or other utopian wackos dont account for any of the reality of the human condition in their political doctrines, they simply create more enemies or more demogoges to hate.

The suicidal aspect to leftist idealogy is the 'tryanny of the weakest" effect. Basically, the most pathetic and ignorant people in a community gravitate toward the waft of leftist sentimentalities.

Invariably the inertia of this rabble is always counter culture because, although it is "God" or "life" they really hate and cant cope with, it is the immediate environment they blame. This is why leftist apologize for savage islamists.

Answer 1

Just because evolution is true, doesn't mean we should base our morals around it. Yes, I believe in evolution, but I also believe that we have advanced to the point were we can take care of everyone. The idea you are talking about is eugenics. It has been done in the past. It is were you kill off, or let die the weaker in a population. But humans have reached a level were we don't need to do this and we all agree it is morally wrong. This also won't negatively affect us much, and if it does it will take many years.

Answer 2

I definitely have appeared at the two the information and the claims made against it and have stumbled on that the information not in basic terms would not help evolution whether it definitely contradicts it. to illustrate, Carbon 14 is cutting-edge in strata which by using evolutionary standards is in basic terms too old to incorporate it. additionally, I definitely have run hundreds of genetic alignments between the Human genome and the genomes of alternative species and have stumbled on a extensive physique of information which contradicts effortless descent between people and the different species. what's extra is that I definitely have caught some proponents of Evolution mendacity with regard to the information. in certainty, i'm now a creationist by way of information.

Answer 3

Such a load of tripe.

Evolution refers to responding to environmental pressures. One of the strengths of human beings in overcoming environmental shifts is the enhancement of the community. Those who are effectively managing community cohesion are more likely to pass on their genes, not the lone wolfs who don't give a damn about their weaker loved ones. The weakest among us are children, followed by the elderly. Children are our future, and the elderly carry wisdom. If we can in community keep them safe and secure from environmental pressures, we will more likely ensure fecundity and survival of genetic lines. Lone wolfs will simply suffer from lack of support.

And I'm an atheist.

Answer 4

Islamist are not leftest, of course. but are on the extreme right of society, because their views are conservitive and non negotible.
But other than being way off on that count your tirade don't make sense.

Answer 5

Boring.

Answer 6

Hey dipsh*t, what the hell does this have to do with religion or spirituality?

Go post your political views somewhere else.

Answer 7

Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot

Answer 8

They are only able to think like victims

Answer 9

jesus was a Leftist

Answer 10

I don't follow you.