The Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and Wahabism in Saudi Arabia have been the two major learning centers for terrorists in the Middle East for the last 75 years including training Bin Laden/Al Qaeda. So why the hell aren't we bombing and invading those countries two countries that shelter the "Schools of Terror"?
2006-10-11 15:53:56 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
because the US being in the middle east has absolutely nothing to do with terrorism ... simple as that. Any prevention of terrorism happens with intelligence measures and protectingour mainland ... not in the hills of afganistan building pipelines or in iraq where there were no terrorists to begin with, just oil fields.
2006-10-11 15:58:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I don`t think you understand. The goal is to control the oil that the world will need in the future so that some oil companies will be assured that they will be the last oil companies left and stay as rich as long as possible. Saddam nationalized the oil and was going to base the oil on the euro currency rather then the dollar and Iran is next. Same with Venezuela, Chavez nationalized the oil and used the revenue to cut poverty in half and he likes to sell oil cheaper and that lowers the price for us but profits are lost. Iran is next!! within this year. The Eisenhower fleet should be off the coast of Iran by the end of the month. I wish I was wrong but you will see. Iran is next.
2006-10-11 16:04:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If we have so much trouble in Iraq, how would invading Saudi and Egypt not end up twice the trouble? Meanwhile, America is so addicted to oil (more than 50% of our oil consumption is imported), and Saudi is #1 oil producer, how do you think we as a country can survive cold-turkey oil disruption as the consequence of oil field in Saudi shuts down?
Trigger happy is a dangerous reaction to Fundamentalist's suicide acts.
2006-10-11 16:01:20 · answer #3 · answered by ele81946 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
because the main base of terrorist operations was in afghanistan. and we also know this because the main leaders/planners/architects of 9/11 were osama bin laden and mullah omar who happened to be in afghanistan or pakistan depending on the time. there are many countries that breed terrorists, look at london as an example. should we bomb london because there are terrorists growing there? NO because that would not work. we need to get real terrorists who know whats going on instead of the unknown random guys at gitmo that are giving us no clue.
2006-10-11 16:19:03 · answer #4 · answered by john s 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
freeing Iraq is expensive in treasure and blood, whether it truly is helpful. examine the October 2002 congressional decision to authorize rigidity against Iraq. Had no longer something to do with 9-11. Has to do with freedom changing terrorism, between different good motives. What makes you think of we are friends with the Saudis? do no longer you think of freeing Saudi Arabia could be like ten cases extra good than Iraq? And Pakistan has nuclear weapons. Heard of them? >> Why no longer end the activity in Afghanistan? << it somewhat is your one good ingredient. in line with risk we desire like a hundred,000 extra troops there. in line with risk two hundred,000 extra. Get the activity finished.
2016-10-02 05:16:27 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What the deadhead Bush-leaguers want you to forget also is that Sadam and Bin Ladin were both trained by the CIA years ago when the director was who? Yup George H.W."Ditcher" Bush.
2006-10-11 16:00:47 · answer #6 · answered by Gaspode 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes!! you should expend billions of dollars and bring sadness and death to a lot of people because they were born in the same country as 2 or 3 or 10 or 20 or 100 terrorists. And of course, the guilty ones will be waiting in the airport with a big sign saying 'i did it'. Please, americans...
2006-10-11 15:58:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
People stop watching Fox News.
Most of the hijackers have been found alive in their home countries. Don't you know this, I thought it was common knowledge.
Educate yourself, don't depend on the news, all they do is feed the myth machine. Again, most of the hijackers are still alive.
2006-10-11 16:11:33 · answer #8 · answered by tcmoosey 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Those are all lies,
dowload a movie called LOOSE CHANGE
that will make you think twice about everything you were ever told,
don't sit there and take it
ask questions
2006-10-11 16:41:09 · answer #9 · answered by knowitall 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The answer is very very simple and easy to understand, both of the countries you mentioned, do not talk against Israel's atrocities against Palestinians.
2006-10-11 16:03:19 · answer #10 · answered by miamian 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋