English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

23 answers

ok if u have fun with him and laugh a lot with him but ur not physically attracted to him then ur just friends...in order for a relationship u need that physical attraction...thats the difference between friends and bf and gf...friends have fun together and laugh together and gf and bfs have fun together laugh and they have that physical bond/attraction to one another...somthing that makes them want to see that other person more then anyone else..hope that helps

2006-10-11 13:19:58 · answer #1 · answered by cold_killa 1 · 0 1

I think you should definitely go for it. With me, I wasn't attracted whatsoever to this guy friend of mine... He wasn't my type at all. but as we got to know each other, i became more and more attracted to him. He's a great guy and I'm attracted to him, personality and I find him really handsome as well. There's immediate attraction, and then there's attraction that builds over time, and that is the one that will last. Looks will fade, things will, sag, but the attraction you feel for the person they really are, won't ever go away, it'll just keep getting stronger and stronger. Trust me, I know exactly where you're coming from.

2006-10-11 13:38:57 · answer #2 · answered by CROWN_PRINCESS 1 · 0 0

Involved as a friend but not boyfriend. There has to be a physical attraction between 2 people or it just will not work.

2006-10-11 13:18:56 · answer #3 · answered by Hwy2?? 2 · 0 0

It depends on what you mean by invovled. There is some attaction or you wouldnt' be having any fun and would be having fun with someone else.

Very often people don't get hit with some kind of lighting bolt (except in books, tv and movies) of love. It develops as you get to know someone and who they are as a person. For me that's the best love.

2006-10-11 13:19:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Depends on what you find attractive. If you need the guy to be verbally abusive or neglectful to be attracted to the guy, like many women like, then I would say that attraction was not the best thing in the world to cultivate.

2006-10-11 13:19:18 · answer #5 · answered by Clown Knows 7 · 0 0

No cuz attraction is something that has so many levels than just superficial looks. Why would you wanna be with someone who was boring but looked good, I'd rather be with an ugly azz guy thats funny than a gorgeous guy with no personality. You should fall in love with the PERSON not their looks

2006-10-11 13:17:58 · answer #6 · answered by ♥Shortie♥ 5 · 0 0

no it is not dumb at all cause you might have so much fun with him that you might fall for him but you need to be honest with him and let him know from the beginning that there is no attraction but there might be some later on in the relationship.

2006-10-11 13:21:59 · answer #7 · answered by good girl 1 · 0 0

that's a tough one but if you have a lot of fun together and have a lot in common then usually the attraction will show up so i wouldn't say that it was dumb just takes things slow and be sure.

2006-10-11 13:18:10 · answer #8 · answered by snail 4 · 0 0

Depends on why you are not attracted to him? If it's a physical thing, sometimes that grows once you see how great he is for you in other ways.

2006-10-11 13:18:49 · answer #9 · answered by Prissy2t4 2 · 0 0

I married that guy! He was a dork at first but he made me laugh. He was my best friend and I loved being around him. Then one day, he grew up and was so adorable. I definately got the good one, and we've been together for 13 years. And I still think he's adorable.

2006-10-11 13:21:00 · answer #10 · answered by belleebuttons 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers