2006-10-11 09:32:00 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Unless I see crops grow because a bible is held above a field, I say it's the sun.
2006-10-11 09:34:48 · answer #1 · answered by i luv teh fishes 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the sun, or else how would we be able to read the bible.
the bible does not sustain our life, it helps us for the after life
2006-10-11 16:37:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sun
2006-10-11 16:34:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Sun while youre alive...the bibles a book...God sustains.
2006-10-11 16:34:33 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Both. It depends on what sense of the word "life" you are refering to.
Logic and reason tell me that the sun is more life sustaining because without it, our earthly bodies would die, However.....
Without the saving knowledge written on the pages of the bible, our spiritual bodies would die and be forever lost in hell.
Therefore both are extremely important.
2006-10-11 16:40:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The sun. Not one Bible has warmed the planet, made crops grow, or made clouds from oceans. We could not live without the sun, and I live fine without a Bible.
2006-10-11 16:36:24 · answer #6 · answered by AuroraDawn 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, I have been living the better part of 39 years without a bible but, science tells me without the sun I'd be dead in short order... thus... yea Old Sol is more life sustaining
2006-10-11 16:34:54 · answer #7 · answered by Uncle Tim 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Bible of course....it's everlasting. The Sun will eventually pass.
2006-10-11 16:43:31 · answer #8 · answered by Barbara H 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The sun, being fueled by bibles
2006-10-11 16:35:37 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
From a theological standpoint, an immortal souls' benefit is more important than that of the mortal body. So, in that case, the Bible (or Koran, Talmund, etc) is more life sustaining.
2006-10-11 16:36:15 · answer #10 · answered by Tofu Jesus 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋