English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If you have not heard of the SQ3R method of reading, it is used for reading textbooks.

The S stands for Survey- you are supposed to think about the title of a chapter and guess what will be included in it. You are to read the introduction, the main headings, the summary, and the questions at the end of the chapter.

The Q stands for question. Here you rephrase (and write) each heading and subheading as a question.

The first R is for read, which you are to do selectively, moving quickly and ignoring content that does not relate to your question.

The second R is for recite, in which you answer the question in your own words. You write the answer using only key words and important parts. You do this for each section in the chapter.

The last R is for reveiw. Here is where you go over and over the information you have taken notes on.

Certainly SQ3R has it's benefits. My question is, what are the flaws and shortcomings in using this method?

2006-10-11 09:23:29 · 2 answers · asked by imjustasteph 4 in Education & Reference Other - Education

2 answers

It takes too long. Try doing that with 6 subjects. You'll be working from 3 PM till the next mourning.

2006-10-11 09:26:04 · answer #1 · answered by Armond B 3 · 0 0

Counterproductive, yet I definitely like each and every thing concerning the bands that i might lump into my favorites. perhaps I only circulate previous any flaws with out particularly thinking approximately them, yet I do only not see any, or perhaps some flaws are a stable element. i assume one element that i theory replaced into incorrect that I disproved the day formerly on the instant with the Elliott Smith album XO replaced into thinking that i ought to purely acquire it properly if i replaced into bummed out, yet I checked it out the day formerly on the instant in a stable temper and replaced into definitely made even happier, like being reunited with an previous buddy. I hadn't listened to it in somewhat a mutually as. i ought to declare that I want Elliott hadn't been overtaken by making use of/achieved such somewhat some drugs and drank lots consequently inevetably killing him (or using him to it), yet that style of falls under the band broke up classification. So, i assume i've got not got an answer, yet I enjoyed the question lots so i needed to place down an answer.

2016-10-19 05:29:38 · answer #2 · answered by janski 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers