Evolution DOES NOT say that life came from dirt!
2006-10-11 08:26:04 · 14 answers · asked by Asilos Magdalena 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Evolution does not say where life came from.
2006-10-11 08:28:37 · update #1
Evolutionists do not claim that God is responsible for evolution.
2006-10-11 08:29:37 · update #2
Why does evolution have to enlighten you about where life originated from? That's a completely different subject; don't confuse the two.
2006-10-11 08:36:05 · update #3
firstly, id lke to point out how hostile everyone else is being towards creation... whats your deal? anyways, youre right... evolution states that we come from primordial soup/ micro unicellular organisms. and know what? im not ok with that! its sad to think that im just a mistake, just a glitch of nature...
think about it. honestly think about it... your nerves and muscles tissues and blood, your cells, your molecules, your atoms, your DNA... everything that you are made up of cannot be a mistake.
evolution says that we are formed from a cell.
we are not. we were CREATED, by God... its not just a sily story, not another fairy tale. its something almost everyone believed when they were young and have forgotten about...weve let science take us over. this world isnt here by chance... that doesnt make any sense. considder the sun, and the earth... if it were any closer to the sun, we'd fry...any farther away and we would freeze. think of how far technology has gone, how much we can do... its not all a mistake. we were intelliegntly created!
its the only thing that makes sense.
2006-10-11 08:46:36 · answer #1 · answered by lauren 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Actually, the theories can coexist. The bible doesn't define what a day is. In example, the bible says God seperated dark and light. This could refer to the creation of stars, which scientists say takes many years (understatement), but a million years may be only a day's work for a diety. So it's possible that the day to make animals refers to the time it took to perfect them into what we see today. Both evolutionists and creationists agree that humans came last (we are relatively young in the grand scheme) too.
Creationism would have more support if they didn't have to depend on a book (regardless how well regarded) to explain their stand. Whereas the theory of evolution has been backed up several times and only the lack of a time machine prevents it from being considered "law."
2006-10-11 08:43:31 · answer #2 · answered by erythisis 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well the simple fact is that most of their education on evolution has come from sources that only talk about the holes in the theory of evolution(even non existent ones.) . they understand what evolution is and how the fact of evolution is different from the theory of evolution. From what I have read in groups and discussion forums, they do not even understand what the theory of evolution is trying to explain. it is not the theory about how life came about, but the theory about how existing life forms evolve.
2006-10-11 08:43:39 · answer #3 · answered by prateek s 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with Truth Seeker...
You'll have to enlighten us about where life does originate from in the theory of evolution.
All the evolutionists I've ever talked with believe it started with the big bang theory: inanimate objects colliding with other inanimate objects, and VIOLA > life.
2006-10-11 08:33:57 · answer #4 · answered by Bob L 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because they can't except the fact that it started from something that they can not study or put a mathematical equation too. God is just too simple an answer for them. Scientists are always trying to get down to the bottom of things and when it comes to the creation of life all they have to rely on is the bible which they just will not except. But at least it gives atheists some kind of ignorant reason for their creation.
2006-10-11 08:32:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Probably for the same reason that evolutionists insist that evolution somehow has something to do with God.
2006-10-11 08:28:31 · answer #6 · answered by Open Heart Searchery 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They don't want to know the real facts-they deal in falsehoods to bolster their creed-evolution doesn't need to say anything about the origin of life, just about how species evolved and adapted to their habitats or became extinct. If creationists played by the rules and argued with integrity their beliefs would be exposed to the world as the utter sham that many people already know them to be.
2006-10-11 08:27:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Because Creation deals with how life started, defenders of Creationism expect to find the same level of confidence and documentation from science.
(That's much nicer than saying young-Earth Creationists are stupid, which, although true, is rude to say out loud).
2006-10-11 08:35:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
the thought of evolution explains, in its very own particular way, how all existence in the international have been given to be the way it truly is. you may no longer divorce that from how existence got here to be contained in the 1st place, which could in easy terms be abiogenesis- existence from non-existence. a medical impossibility. because of the fact the thought precludes the existence of God or any kind of writer, existence would desire to come from no longer something. In different words, 2+2=(something yet 4)
2016-10-02 04:57:27 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They insist on this because reading a book on evolutionary biology would make their little heads hurt, so they just believe what Brother Bubba tells them from the pulpit, since following like brainless sheep is effortless.
2006-10-11 08:31:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋