http://www.biosurvey.ou.edu/oese/CreationistPeriodicTable_use.jpg
2006-10-11 07:42:38 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No. We should replace Creationists with people who want to learn something real.
2006-10-11 07:44:56 · answer #1 · answered by Gene Rocks! 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Hmm, tough one. I'll vote for no though.
The scribbles on the page, are those supposed to be arguments against the periodic table? The "When will it end?" and the bigamist comment seem negative, but the rest is just history. I'm guessing they're trying to use the changes to show it's inconsistent and therefore obviously flawed.
As to carolinatinpan's statement, no water is not only one Earth. There is evidence of ice on Mars for one, and who's to say beyond that. Also only about 90 of the elements exist naturally. All of the late members are synthesized in labs and are not stable.
2006-10-11 14:50:07 · answer #2 · answered by Phil 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL. I was gonna say that the table would be rather small at four elements! This proves it!!
What amazes me is that the table was designed in such a way that other elements, not yet discovered, were able to be forcasted on the chart based on periodicity...and that these elements have since been discovered, while others have actually been created by man in labs!
2006-10-11 14:46:18 · answer #3 · answered by YDoncha_Blowme 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the table of elements helps prove creationism. There was nothing ,Then came gases, then these gases somehow exploded.That created all 115 known elements and arranged them in such a way that life came from something that was never alive. The explosion also placed the water only on Earth,The sun perfectly situated to keep the Earth warm enough for life to evolve from some living strands of gunk. This stuff mutated and evolved into someone who can send crafts and itself into outer space. And nowhere Else does life exist.115 elements from gases.
2006-10-11 14:49:37 · answer #4 · answered by carolinatinpan 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Huh? What does the table of elements have to do with creationism or evolutionism? According to creationists (I am of their number), God created the elements. According to evolutionists, the elements "magically" came into being. But who's arguing about the elements and their atomical composition?
2006-10-11 14:49:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would you need to? If you believe that God created Heaven and earth, then He created all of the elements too, just because we as "man" have listed them and keep revising what we are doing makes no difference. Science keeps progressing thankfully, but progress means changes. Otherwise you wouldn't be sitting in a warm house typing on a computer, you would be chopping firewood and sending pony express letters.
Have a nice day.
2006-10-11 14:49:03 · answer #6 · answered by reesie271 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Good heavens, don't give them any ideas. Besides, could it really be a table when there is only one entry -- Godulux, the divine element.
2006-10-11 14:44:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It would have made chemistry a lot easier! lol! But, even as a christian, I say no because it describes the make-up of God's creations, and their is nothing wrong with that
2006-10-11 14:59:20 · answer #8 · answered by ASH 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I didn' know there was a creationist one. You'd need better proof than what you have given.
2006-10-11 14:46:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh yes! And all that scientific nonsense with "proofs" and "hypothosis" should be kicked to the curb in lieu of "Goddidit"
Ya know...the "theory" of evolution isn't the only one we should get rid of! Let's toss the theory of gravity and aerodynamics too! They're just theories!
Praise cheeses!
2006-10-11 14:46:12 · answer #10 · answered by Black Parade Billie 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋