Blows the eternal and unchanging thing out the window, doesn't it.
2006-10-11 07:22:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Allison L 6
·
4⤊
6⤋
A) Anyone who does not enjoy the smell of a good bull sacrifice is clearly a heathen, and therefore must be eliminated before they can spread their heathen wickedness throughout the land. George Bush is the classic example here.
B) This is where you're not seeing the bigger picture. What you need to do is find a pimp to take her and get a percentage of the profits, it's still classed as a sale, but it works better for your business portfolio.
C) You've interpreted the word "contact" in its very broad sense so I'm guessing you're either a girl or you're under 12 years of age. The actual interpretation refers to sex. Unfortunately, the Bible was a bit sensitive about these issues therefore they replaced the word with the less offensive "contact". And I have to agree that whilst I'm a big fan of sex, I'd rather not engage in it during that particular period - no pun intended!
2006-10-11 07:33:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by John P 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
The previous testomony appeared forward to the hot Covenant: (Jer. 31:31-34). a great number of the regulation develop into symbolic of the hot covenant which incorporate no longer mixing wool and linen (this is no longer mixed fabric, yet very particular.) there are a number of rationalization why this could have made perfect experience. First it could have been a symbolic command to maintain your self organic. Secondly it could have been to cut up themselves from the customs of the Canaanites. it may even have prevented unscrupulous weavers from merchandising mixed blends to blend a extra costly fabric (linen) with a less costly (wool). this is the comparable rationalization why outfits could desire to tell the blend and the share of each and every textile in the textile. The word of God is eternal while it somewhat is theory to point the full word of God and not individual factors.
2016-12-08 12:55:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
a) bulls were not burned as a sacrifice. all animals had to be slaughtered in a kosher way (ie as quick and painlessly as possible) and they were eaten just like regular food, usually by priests and their families. burning a bull as a sacrifice is obviously not kosher. only certain parts of the bull that people don't eat were burned - AFTER the bull was already dead. what's the difference between burning parts if the intestines, or throwing them in the garbage like people today do?
b) slavery is illegal. you seem to be under the impression that the bible commands slavery. it doesn't.
c) the bible assumes the woman you are having sex with is your wife. unless you have a crappy marriage, most men know when their wives are having their period. its called marital intimacy.
2006-10-11 07:30:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
These are not even original questions, since every idiot who likes to pluck verses of the Bible out of context has asked the same thing.
Unless you are Jewish, then you must know that Jesus, Peter & Paul all said that Christians are no longer bound by the Law of Moses under the New Testament since the death of the messiah brought in the age of grace.
2006-10-11 09:49:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Randy G 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Connect your biblical dots:
Law worketh wrath: Romans 4:15
God hath not appt'd us unto wrath: 1Th 5:9
"Wrath" is among "unholy" things in 2Tim 3.
Our Father, deliver us from evil: Mt 6:13
We are delivered from the law: Rom 7:6
Whatsoever is not of faith is sin: Rom 14:23
The law is not of faith: Gal 3:12
Perhaps the word of reconciliation is "grace".
The GRACE of our Lord JC with you all. Amen.
2006-10-11 07:31:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think you are taking these out of context. If you read more you MAY find that ...
a) God wants the bull to be burned in a well ventilated area away from residential areas.
b) If you want to sell your daughter, God recommends flying to England. There you can weigh your daughter and get that amount in return (say 120lbs). So start fattening her up if you haven't been already.
c) Identification is easy. Doesn't Lev 15:25 coin the term PMS?
2006-10-11 07:22:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
5⤋
Miss Siagon, your time is up. The play closed down 5 years ago and what are you still doing here?? You are a stupid idiotic person, stay off the internet. go join the suicider bomb school.
2006-10-11 07:30:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by MiKe 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
Try to Think intelligently next time when you ask a question or maybe its impossible for you. HMMM......
God exist and is eternal but you are unchanging and have been given over to a reprobate mind which means that You are a lost cause! Got me? Now move on...........
2006-10-11 07:25:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Pashur 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
1. yes, smite away.
2. $20
3. Avoid the question of women entirely and go after underage boys just like the Christians do.
2006-10-11 07:25:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Good Times, Happy Times... 4
·
2⤊
3⤋
you mention all levitical law which christ overcame...i guess you are trying to make a funny. I do like the mental image of you burning a bull in your back yard thats somewhat amusing. I often wonder if this is the law for the jewish faith still do they truly follow it still today?
But to answer your question Christ overcame legalism and the levitical laws ...and most of what you are quoting is greatly out of context.
2006-10-11 07:24:40
·
answer #11
·
answered by Robert K 5
·
5⤊
3⤋