Yes.....and remember, were only as good as our govt....
2006-10-11 07:06:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
That would be nice but they are all blaming each other. Nobody will vote Governor Napolitano out of office and she has vetoed every option at securing our border. Arizona's border is a seive and she has blocked every effort to fix it. Your illegal immigration problem starts and ends in Arizona.
By the way, yes she's a Democrat.
2006-10-11 07:05:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by RAR24 4
·
5⤊
0⤋
There probable would be extra gerrymandering by various state legislatures after this census. yet, how would gerrymandering interior of states help in a presidential election? with the exception of Nebraska & Maine, each state is winner-take-involved approximately electors, and that i can not think of every person gerrymandering the borders of the states themselves. after all, given all of the communicate in Washington correct to the project, it rather is somewhat no longer likely that some style of blanket amesty like what you're conversing approximately would desire to get by Congress, despite if Obama had to do it. (And if he did & would desire to, this way of circulate would income various votes against him as properly.)
2016-12-26 16:17:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely
2006-10-11 07:16:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by The Hell With This Constitution 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Honey,I am planning on it...
flawed.....you are just what you called others grow up and stop playing the tired old worn our race card.......
Don't trust the Democrats they will give away the entire country with that bleeding heart crap.I was one for years,now I'm voting for the person with the best plan and the strongest stance on illegals and securing our borders.
2006-10-11 07:04:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Yakuza 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Not all... only those wanting to give 20 million illegals citizenship... the likes of Kennedy, Kerry, Boxer, Feinstein, McCain... etc.
2006-10-11 07:50:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by j H 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
That is so funny. You consistently reelect law breakers and expect them to uphold the law for you. You Americans really are dis articulated with reality. Why don't you migrate to another planet where you can live and inbreed alone without bothering the rest of us.
2006-10-11 07:11:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bubba 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
One of the great benefits of democracy (and its greatest downfall) is that people get to vote for whomever they like, for or against whatever issues are the most important to them.
The word you use in relation to politicians, however: 'punish', is telling for any number of reasons.
2006-10-11 07:18:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by DBG 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes, I am against illegal immigration.
But i remember this is my country, Not theirs, why should i vote for someone who will deport all illegals over someone who can handle the iraq war and etc.
What we really need is someone who is going to deport all illegals and keep them out, and secure America.
2006-10-11 07:06:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
The ones who aren't actively working against it, yes. But only IF thier opponant is better on this subject.
2006-10-11 13:17:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by DAR 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Absolutely...both parties! They made the laws in the 90's they just "forgot" to get them enforced!
2006-10-11 07:03:44
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋