English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It is known that the light and the heat of the waves that come from the sun, interacting with the microwaves coming from the waves of interstellar gases, supply the natural balance that gets to Earth every moment.
On the surface there are typical phenomena of elements that have instable atomic nucleus, a natural radioactivity. It artificially changes the radioactivity into an unbalanced condition, causing a cancerous nuclear reaction, phenomenon discovered years ago by the responsible for the nuclear science revolution, who, for considering it modern, discredited Earth’s modified radioactive unbalance. This vision opposes my consciousness, which only recognizes ethic and moral in science if based on natural scientific research, which may be accidental, criminal, professional or vicious, for the artificial exist to compromise life.

2006-10-11 05:32:26 · 15 answers · asked by britotarcisio 6 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

15 answers

The problem here is not nuclear physics or any advances in scientific knowledge.
The imbalance is the advances made in the sciences against the total lack of any real advances of knowledge in the area of the humanities.
We need to reverse the dwindling spiral of resposibility,ethics morals and integrity, the deterioration of human beings, with the same amount of knowledge and understanding about ourselves, mankind, that now exists about our exterior physical world in the sciences.

2006-10-11 05:44:13 · answer #1 · answered by thetaalways 6 · 0 0

There is no such thing as "artificial fission". Fission has been occurring naturally on Earth for billions of years. Man has only recently been able to harness and focus this process. Has it caused an "imbalance"? Who knows? Why stop with fission? What about "unnatural" electrical energy or microwave or radio signals and how THEY are affecting the the balance of which you speak?

How has the use of the computer you just typed this question on affected the balance of the universe?

2006-10-11 05:46:40 · answer #2 · answered by lunatic 7 · 0 0

weapons. Iran is administered by potential of twisted Muslim extremists bent on exporting terrorism contained in the call of Islam. they have been shown to be in touch in terrorism and there is not any reason to have faith they could substitute now. in the event that they have been somewhat following Islam they does no longer act as they do. they have refused UN help in bobbing up nuclear capacity. i ask your self why this is? do no longer evaluate appeasing them. That got here approximately contained in the 1930's in Europe and the effect develop into Hitler's Germany. people who do no longer learn from background are doomed to repeat it! Iran is a snake coiled to strike. would desire to we enable them to have venom of their bite? it is the rustic whose chief has been accurately suggested by potential of dissimilar materials as pledging to smash Israel. Israel has had nuclear weapons for years (this develop into no longer suggested on the time) and has no longer used them. If Iran have been to apply nukes Israel could retaliate and there could be some actual tremendously sh!t happening. What do you think of?

2016-10-02 04:47:41 · answer #3 · answered by boland 4 · 0 0

The fundamental purpose behind the quest for knowledge is to increase power. Power can be used for 'good' or for 'bad', but is in itself, neutral.

Nature has set us up as pawns in this game. We either play by nature's rules and seek increasing power, or be wiped out by those who are willing to play. There is no "let's all just live in peace" option.

2006-10-11 05:43:53 · answer #4 · answered by lenny 7 · 0 0

Are you against nuclear power stations?
When the oil runs out we have to use alternatives.
Fusion is said to be cleaner than fission, but who knows.
There are lots of other ways of generating power.
Sun, wind, waves, geothermal etc.

2006-10-11 06:44:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Wow, that is very scientific,
let me guess what your favorite subject was in high school...

I have always known we are going to desroy ourselves. Humanity is the deadliest species on the planet. I hope I am dead before the earth blows itsef up.

2006-10-11 05:39:40 · answer #6 · answered by danksprite420 6 · 0 0

Yeah, what you said. It has it's wow value, but it's not a good thing. I am also against nuclear power plants until they come up with a better way to deal with the waste. We got rid of ours in my state.

2006-10-11 05:35:24 · answer #7 · answered by AuroraDawn 7 · 0 1

I reflect carefully

2006-10-11 05:34:44 · answer #8 · answered by bradthepilot 5 · 0 0

I think Jesus turned to God and said "Dad , the kids found the match's ."

2006-10-11 05:40:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What is the relevance of this question in this category?

2006-10-11 05:35:22 · answer #10 · answered by Rajan S 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers