2006-10-11 04:52:49 · 7 answers · asked by superdave 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
We would blame it on Saddam Hussein. After all, he was responsible for the September 11 attacks, right? And he had nukes, right? Right?
2006-10-11 05:00:57 · answer #1 · answered by x 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nice question, but I don't think that would happen. These elements are traceable and it'd be near impossible to get them all together in one central location to nuke a city. Even if someone was to bomb a nuclear missle silo, it wouldn't trigger a nuclear explosion because they are designed to explode only when deliberately armed and fired.
2006-10-11 12:17:09 · answer #2 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends.
If you are a liberal, the response will be to blame the US and Bush for antagonizing the poor freedom fighters that ignited the bomb, and call for deep introspection as to why we are so evil and brought this upon ourselves.
2006-10-11 11:56:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It will bark like a mad dog and then slowly but surely attack under developed Islamic country.
2006-10-11 11:58:08 · answer #4 · answered by Seagull 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A military state where no one will be able to move freely without
a good reason that they will decide for you, if you're allowed to move freely at all.
2006-10-11 11:57:26 · answer #5 · answered by kekeke 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would stay the hell out of Mecca...
2006-10-11 12:03:14 · answer #6 · answered by mmd 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"It's Bush' fault."
"Bush did it."
"It's a conspiracy...concoted by Bush."
2006-10-11 11:56:05 · answer #7 · answered by kitty fresh & hissin' crew 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋