I don't think the us admin is "playing chicken" i think they are chicken. For how long did they say that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and never attacked until they knew for sure Iraq had nothing. Why won't they attack N Korea? because they know they can and will push back.
2006-10-11 03:59:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
How is it that some on here think that it is President Bush's fault that North Korea has nukes. Or that when he tried to have one on one talks it was discovered that North Korea was making counterfeit U.S. money and selling the stuff that Clinton's treaty in 1994 gave them? The U.S. wants other countries in the talks so that North Korea can not say that this or that is what was promised and have it become a he said she said argument. The President of the U.S. is trying to do the right thing by having the other countries involved.. The ones that are closest to North Korea and would have the greatest harm done if things go or get worse.
Also North Korea's leader said once again if the U.S. does not talk to them one on one they will send the missiles into the U.S. and South Korea. The U.S. has not said this not will it. However if provoked by the attack by this country then the U.S. will retaliate.
2006-10-11 04:00:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by fatboysdaddy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No way. Yeah, they have a loopy militia of brainwashed killing machines, yet mutually as they made a bypass on us something of the international might have our backs. the actual reason China acts like they have their decrease lower back is using the actuality if we did could opt to invade N. Korea there may be a substantial humanitarian disaster for them with North Korean electorate working over their border. N. Korea does not have the technologies to furnish any form of missle to US territory so the main substantial they had do is bypass after our allies, like S. Korea or Japan. North Korea is run via a mad guy and something of the international is conscious of it and that they haven't any actual pals. the main substantial desirable element for the U. S. to do is to sit down down decrease lower back and enable them to proceed to colour themselves into the corner.
2016-11-27 21:31:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
W is going to kill us all. Why did we attack Iraq, you know, the people who had NO wmd's, and not korea who said we HAVE wmd's? I read an interesting report though. The reason we didn't go into Iraq in Desert Storm with the first bush was because it was estimated that it would take over 500,000 troops to secure Iraq! W is trying to do it with 1/5th that number. Anyone else see failure as a winning strategy?
2006-10-11 03:57:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jon C 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Playing chicken? North Korea?
Don't be surprised to see a superpower chicken out alright, when they launch the missiles at us. We'll have a decimated army because Iraq gobbled up all the troops...
2006-10-11 03:50:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no the us is not .maybe they could attack japan. no i don't think that the USA is playing "chicken" i think that north Korea is bluffing they no the us have the capabilities two total their little country it's wouldn't be much of a war.there probably nuke submarines circling their little country as we speak.
2006-10-11 03:53:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
More like the mouse who roared. N. Korea wants us to attack so that they can force us to rebuild them like we have done for so many other countries.
2006-10-11 03:52:40
·
answer #7
·
answered by rac 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The US is not going to attack N. Korea just impose sanctions but you can bet your----- if they shoot at us we will shoot back. The US government will never learn to leave other counrties alone-we must have our way or it's the highway for others. Dumb, Very Dumb.
2006-10-11 03:52:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by dragon 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because Bush is stupid. he's asking for trouble and he's gona wait till his final few months to attack and leave it for next president.
2006-10-11 03:52:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I totally agree.Our administration needs to grow up already.
2006-10-11 03:51:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by eva b 5
·
0⤊
1⤋