English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-10-11 02:41:18 · 9 answers · asked by \ 5 in Health Diseases & Conditions Infectious Diseases

you dont catch hepatitis b only by sex stupid woman

2006-10-11 02:51:28 · update #1

its only uk dont give hepatitis b vaccine!

2006-10-11 02:54:18 · update #2

9 answers

Well, hepatitis is an infection of the liver caused by hepatitis viruses. The hapatitis B virus is passed through infected blood from mothers to theirs babies. If the Mother hasn't the virus there's no point of taking a vaccine if the probability of babies getting it is 0%. Is a total wasted of resources. But if it isn't part of the routine childhood immunisation programme of a certain country, it means that somehow, things are controlled. From one part, mother before giving birth must to do blood exams that tell us if the virus is present or not. Usually babies that have to take the vaccine, take several doses, one after birth, another with one month old, two month and after that they have to do a blood test at 12 month to check that the baby has not developed the disease. Maybe in the other europen countries & US the hepatitis virus is so common that the probability of having a mother without the virus is so small that they realise that is better to vaccinate all babies in order to stop the virus! All countries have their own diseases problems, that's why you have to take several vaccines if you planning to visit some countries in Africa or Brasil for example. But if you still want to vaccinate your baby you can, it's your choice you know! Talk to your GP for more information's. Don't worry and take care.

2006-10-11 03:11:35 · answer #1 · answered by ximissa 2 · 1 0

Do NOT get vaccinated.

A vaccinated person is MORE likely to get a disease than a non-vaccinated person. The whole theory of vaccination is flawed. It causes a weakening of the immune system thus making those who are innoculated more susceptible to disease.
There are so many awful side effects to vaccination that it should be considered extremely dangerous.
Just sit back and think for a while.
Is there any sense in injecting a disease directly into the bloodstream.
We have been subjected to an awful mind control program to enable the drug manufacturers to make a fortune.

The Vaccination Hoax
http://www.whale.to/b/hoax1.html


If you go to the vaccination liberation web page, at
http://www.vaclib.org/exemption.htm
You will find all the forms necessary to provide exemption for your child.

If you want to study the history of vaccination, see
http://dgwa1.fortunecity.com/body/vaccination.html

2006-10-12 17:33:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yep, funds. whilst they extra my 2d toddler to me after my c-area he became screaming his head off. I asked why he became crying like that and the nurse pronounced that he'd in basic terms gotten his Hep B shot. I nonetheless do not comprehend if that became an detrimental reaction or if he became crying for another reason. My 0.33 toddler has had 2 extreme reactions (his 4 and 6 month photos) and that i'm not vaccinating in any respect from now on. After ultimately doing the examine I could desire to have finished before my first toddler became born, i've got desperate that vaccines are neither powerful nor risk-free. and a few are ridiculous like the hepatitis shot. i've got faith the comparable way with regard to the antibiotic eye drops at beginning. i've got not got any STDs and that i'll be having a c-area besides (due in October) so what's the think approximately that?

2016-10-16 01:53:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Hep b vaccine is only given to babies who are at risk such as babies whose parents were born in high risk countries or are injecting drug users. If a baby is not at risk they do not need to be given unecessary vaccines and placed at unecessary risk of an adverse reaction.

2006-10-11 22:07:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

its thought we dont have as much of a problem as other countries in the uk babies are given it if at risk usually because there parents have it

2006-10-11 02:43:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

pictures vw corrado united states
HEPITITIS B A. horizontal directional drill tooling. false negative drug test. 4 ga wire. ... europen countries. CL...
www.whutchinsenterprises.com/get/enter...

2006-10-11 02:45:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

because Hep B is a sexually transmitted disease and newborns in the UK aren't out having sex.

Mode of Transmission: Person to person exchange of bodily fluids: unprotected vaginal, oral, and anal sex; infected pregnant mom to unborn child; sharing of contaminated drug needles; piercing the skin with contaminated tattoo or piercing needles; piercing the skin with contaminated medical or dental instruments; receiving contaminated blood or blood products; and receiving contaminated tissues or organs.

So explain to me why we need to shove chemicals into our newborns for this?

2006-10-11 02:49:37 · answer #7 · answered by ChemGeek 4 · 0 0

good question, i thin everyone should be vaccinated from a young age then in years to come HBV will be gone,

2006-10-14 11:15:31 · answer #8 · answered by theresa d 3 · 0 0

It is costly.

2006-10-11 02:47:11 · answer #9 · answered by dr sachpw 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers