This decision has been taken by North Corea, against the International Laws... if you was the president of a big nation, or the UN representative would you try to convence international comunity to invade north Corea? or do what?
2006-10-10 23:53:15 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
P.S... China , Russia, nobody is backing them... no umbrella
2006-10-11 04:22:41 · update #1
An invasion on the North probably wouldn't be to wise on our behalf(U.S) at this time.. As sweet as it would be to take that piece of S&%^ out once and for all. You have to look at it in 2 ways. If we did bomb his sites we would have to take them all out almost all at once. Which wouldnt be easy do to the terrain and the places they are hidden. Other wise he would use what we missed and rain hell down on the South Koreans including the most inportant areas the U.S bases. we have aproximately 30,000 -40,000 troops here we could put up a hell of a fight but we are looking at a million lil screaming North Koreans and that is not including the sleepers that have been placed throughout South Korea that would be assisting there Special Forces soldiers that would sneak over though hidden tunnels during the strike. The casulties no doubt would be in the hundreds of thousands. Getting him to the peace talks right now would be our safest bet and in the mean time start getting more research and technology invested into our missle defence systems. Because with North Korea having possible nukes all other countries will want them as a defense.
2006-10-11 00:25:06 · answer #1 · answered by Brian T 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Korea has WMD. That is a done deal. The US, Russia, China and the other nuclear powers should make it clear that if North Korea uses a device in anger that the major powers will together turn North Korea into a sea of glass. It is not them having bombs that is the problem it is what they might do with them. The threat of retaliation worked for the USSR and the US for a great number of years. We should extend it to North Korea.
2006-10-11 08:00:59 · answer #2 · answered by oldhippypaul 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unfortunately it's not as easy as that. The world of politics is a complicated world. I liked Nelson Mandela's comment "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" If we invade North Korea, should we have invaded France for testing or India or Pakistan?
Also I understand that no-one was killed in the test whereas Mugabe murders people everyday and gets away with it.
By the way, that's alot of punctuation going on there, exclamation marks go after a sentence, not before, only one would be necessary, president is spelt wrong and the question "should be invaded" is a bit odd, I presume you mean "should they be invaded?" again only the one question mark is needed.
2006-10-11 07:09:52 · answer #3 · answered by voodoobluesman 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. It's a waste of time. As long as China backs them you can not have a ground invasion that will get the support of anyone as the cost would be unacceptable.
China can solve the problem by cutting off aid. Of course that will bring a new problem of the collapse of the country and who knows what would happen. But it'd be a problem that could be solved where as the current one, who knows what this idiot will do.
2006-10-11 07:00:16 · answer #4 · answered by madjer21755 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't invade just yet. All they are doing is trying to wag what they got and scare everybody into believing they are a huge threat and "don't mess with n. korea", they are dangerous, but proving that they are doesn't and won't stop countries from taking "action". Once they cross the line (whatever that is), of America, we will respond. We have never really been one to sit back and watch.
2006-10-11 07:15:54 · answer #5 · answered by Bailey 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Thinking to envade north korea militarily at present is to lead thyself into ignominous close and heavy destruction to the human society. I think the better way to bring that child country to the table is economic sanction. Otherwise the effect is bad for the whole world.
2006-10-11 07:29:10 · answer #6 · answered by Abel M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think an invasion is an option since they have a formidable armed force. The only thing the United Nations can do is apply sanctions, which unfortunately hit the innocent more than he guilty.
2006-10-11 07:10:30 · answer #7 · answered by brainyandy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
North Korea are a loose cannon and have to be disarmed. The leadership should be removed as they waste valuable resources on weapons research while large swathes of their population are starving and require outside charity to feed them!
2006-10-11 07:03:37 · answer #8 · answered by Furball 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, lets invade a country thats just demonstrated nuclear power and is a good friend of China (dispite them not agreeing with the nukes).
2006-10-11 07:02:42 · answer #9 · answered by bartmanekul 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Thank God Clinton made the North Koreans agree with the US to not enrich their uranium...
http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20061010/capt.0674bb85a3f34d42bfbc9f03e2a17848.us_north_korea_history_ny107.jpg?x=380&y=255&sig=mHPPpG2W.3WllVoHJ.m1Vg--
2006-10-11 08:39:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋